Ron Baalke wrote:

<Since Mercury and Venus are inside of Earth's orbit, then by the process of  
elimination, that would indicate the parent body for E chondrites are either 
Mercury or Venus.  OK, fair enough.>

and

<While it is still possible the parent body for the E chondrites and NWA 011 
may 
be Mercury or Venus, you can't rule out asteroids just yet either. >

Both of these statements are incorrect.  Both Mercury and Venus are 
differentiated bodies.   Neither can be the source of "chondrites" of any 
kind.  They could however the the source of various "achondrites".

If people are interested in a mystery here is a big one.  Pallasites are 
generally 
assumed to be from the core / mantle boundry.  There are quite a few 
pallasites 
so their formation doesn't appear to be an unusual occurance.   There are 
also a 
lot of irons from the core side of the boundry.   There are however no, as in 
zero, meteorites with pallasitic type olivine crystals with out an iron 
matrix.   
The mantle by volume would be larger than the core of most differentiated 
bodies.  So where are the olivine meteorites?  One would think they would be 
at least as abundent as the pallasites.  Is the pallasite theory incorrect?   
Is there 
a yet undiscovered class of meteorites?   Is there a mechanism that prevents 
the formation of a pure olivine region or destroys them after formation, 
preventing 
a pure olivine meteorite from reaching earth?   There are no answers.   The 
big mystery isn't whether we have a meteorite from mecury, it is where is the 
olivine?

Eric Olson
http://www.star-bits.com

______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to