John,
I expressed some of these same views when the organization was forming.  I
have been dealing in and collecting meteorites, fossils and minerals for
42 years and have an impeccable record of honesty in buying and selling
these items we love so much.  I have been a member of several mineral
clubs and societies which were helpful to the dealer and collector alike.
I also think an organization such as the IMCA is a good idea as far as
having members who share information to better the dealing in and
collecting of meteorites.  However, at this point I have not asked to
become a member, because, rightly or wrongly, I have perceived it as more
of a police action committee.  If my perception is wrong and the club has
higher ideals, then I would like to become a member.  Otherwise I will
remain on the outside and continue my good business practices as I always
have, just as the two gentlemen earlier mentioned by Michael Blood always
have (Rob Elliott and Michael Farmer).  If the organization can help bond
us all together in a way helpful to all and not by espousing suspicion or
creating a police state, then I think the remaining few might be
interested in joining.
Could the list perhaps see a statement of objectives of the IMCA?
Thanks and best wishes to all,
Thomas H. Webb

On Sun, 19 May 2002, John Gwilliam wrote:

> At 08:57 PM 5/19/02 -0500, Mark Bostick wrote:
> >  From M. Blood..
> >
> >Rob, Mike & all,
> >We all know Rob & Mike are 100% honest & stand by their material.
> >Why aren't you guys members?  Since, as I understand it, the primary
> >purpose of IMCA is to guarentee authenticity, why would anyone NOT be
> >a member?
> >If we aren't all in this togeather, then it is really worthless,
> >impotent
> >nonsense. (or, maybe I'm missing something - if so, someone please tell
> >me what it is)
> >Rob & Mike, I'm listening - tell me the strait poop - perhaps you have
> >good reasons, in which case I will bale as well. If not, then let's all
> >do the
> >right thing.
> >And Rhett, let's not be shy, here, or what's the point.
> >RSVP
> >Best wishes, Michael
> >
> >Michael,
> >
> >I think this is a very bad ideal.  It is not our job or responsibility to 
> >police or try to control the market.  The IMCA is a step and should be 
> >looked as such.  I had the ideal of a dealers award. This could be another 
> >IMCA step.  We could and should look for ways to expand it.  This is not 
> >one of them (I believe).
> >
> >I run probley more meteorite auctions on eBay then anyone.  I will not put 
> >any statement in my auctions telling bidders to only buy from IMCA 
> >members.  For several reasons.  One that comes to my head is I do not 
> >agree with all the members on their choice of ethics.
> >
> >Me and you (Blood) have both had problems with one member that has still 
> >not sent me a refund promised even in an e-mail to the list (Brad 
> >Sampson).  (Yes Brad I understand, you lost my address the 8th time I sent 
> >it to you and you cant find my e-mail and couldnt find me in the 
> >meteorite-list archives).
> >
> >The IMCA from my understanding...as a member...only promises the meteorite 
> >is real.  So I have no problem with others "ethnics"....the moment this 
> >changes I will have to see if this is a membership I wish to be a part of.
> >
> >Mark Bostick "The Big Collector"
> 
> 
> To List Members,
> Mark, and some others, makes several very good points here that I 
> support.  Organizations such as the IMCA (Yes...I am  a member) make 
> progress in baby steps, not giant ones.  Whenever human beings are 
> involved, there will always be exceptions, rogues, and self-promoting 
> individuals in every well meaning group.  Moreover, just because someone 
> doesn't belong to "the group" shouldn't make them a target of 
> suspicion.  Progress in a positive direction takes time and requires 
> patience - there is no "quick fix" for the problems that ail society in 
> general and our group specifically.  In a Utopian world, all items sold on 
> Ebay and the Internet would be legitimate and ethical.  Until we reach that 
> higher standard, we should expect, though not condone, the frailties of 
> ignorant and devious seller alike.
> 
> What we can do is to make sure that those of us with knowledge conduct our 
> personal business in a forthright and fair manner.  Eventually, the problem 
> will correct itself.  Until then, expect problems along the way from self 
> centered people.
> 
> Sometimes the best and most memorable education a person can receive is at 
> the hand of a con man.  We as a group - a group of meteorite collectors and 
> dealers, are not responsible to protest every prospective meteorite buyer 
> from being burned.  The education and experience that can be gained from 
> "being taken" will only enlighten those that are quick to bid on an auction 
> item without doing their homework.  I am not a baby sitter to everyone that 
> bids on meteorites on Ebay - nor are the rest of you.  If you want to 
> champion a truely improtant cause with your time, take on something more 
> noble like feeding the hungry or housing the homeless.
> 
> 
> Off My Soapbox,
> 
> John Gwilliam
> 
> 
> John Gwilliam Meteorites
> PO Box 26854
> Tempe  AZ  85285
> http://www.meteoriteimpact.com 
> 


______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to