July 30, 2002 Greetings Mr. Marco Langbroek!
Although you are no doubt more knowledgeable than I am, wouldn't it be conceivable that if Pribram and Neuschwanstein do belong to a meteoroid stream, that the dynamics and formation of it would be quite different than from what we are used to? Long strewn fields! Mark Fox Newaygo, MI USA --- Marco Langbroek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This will give the CRE guys headaches. If > Neuschwanstein is a stream with > the Pribram meteorite (and it really seems to be): > then how come that > Pribram has a CRE age of 19 +- 2 Ma as recently > refined (see Lindner en > Welten, Radiant (j. DMS) 24:2 (2002))? That is way > too much for an intact > stream. > > - Marco Langbroek > > > --- > Marco Langbroek private: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Leiden University work: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Faculty of Archaeology > P.O. Box 9515 > http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek/ > NL-2300 RA Leiden > The Netherlands > > "What seest thou else > In the dark backward and abysm of time?" > > William Shakespeare: The Tempest act I scene 2 > --- > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
