Dear Jim and Paul:
I was unpleasantly surprised and dismayed by your posts to the List
late last night. You are both well-liked, respected and active
members of the meteorite community. "Meteorite Times" is just the
most recent service you've provided.
I happen to be well aware of one of the problems that arose out of
the current issue -- an article caused an upset between two prominent
dealers. Offense was caused more by what was left out of the article,
rather than what was included, and that's unfortunate, especially
since both parties are friends of yours.
It's not enough to warrant cancellation of the entire project!
As you both know, I've worked extensively as a writer and editor (and
was very pleased indeed to be interviewed by you for "MT"). It's not
always possible -- especially when you're working on a publication in
your spare time -- to check every fact, every link. Yes, as editors,
you have a responsibility to present accurate and objective
information but -- let's face it -- you're not getting paid a
full-time wage to produce "MT," so some leeway is in order. I think
it is well understood in the community that you are both creating
"MT" in your spare time, and out of a desire to share your knowledge
and enthusiasm with others. You don't have a full-time proofreader on
staff, and you don't have a full time fact-checker on staff. As such,
I expect the community could find it in their hearts to offer up a
little forgiveness and understanding. (And a few "thank yous" for
previous issues would be in order as well).
Those of us who have published a magazine on a regular basis, know
what a massive, gruelling, and often thankless undertaking it is. I
doubt I could ever be talked into doing it again. Even Joel Schiff's
"Meteorite" -- a publication that is internationally respected and
loved by its subscribers -- was once in hot water over a Letter to
the Editor that it published innocently; a letter that accidentally
offended the family of a prominent meteorite scientist. I mention
this not as a criticism of Joel -- who is one of the most universally
admired people in the field -- but as an illustration that even the
most ethical and responsible publisher is sometimes unaware that one
item is going to offend a particular reader.
I hope that after you've had some time to reflect -- and after you've
read a bunch of other emails like this one -- you'll consider
publishing "MT" again in the future. You can always count on me to
produce another 3,000 word interview for you, but I'm not sure that
your other readers would stand for it : )
Regards from one of your fans,
Geoff Notkin
www.paleozoic.org
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
- [meteorite-list] Another mag bites the dust! James Tobin
- Re: [meteorite-list] Another mag bites the dust! mafer
- Re: [meteorite-list] Another mag bites the dust! walter branch
- Re: [meteorite-list] Another mag bites the dust! geoking
- Re: [meteorite-list] Another mag bites the dust! Rosemary Hackney
- Re: [meteorite-list] Another mag bites the dust! almitt
- Re: [meteorite-list] Another mag bites the dust! nakhladog

