Actually, there are hundreds of these from the last 5 years. They are
all equilibrated ordinary chondrites classified by magnetic
susceptibility. Because no thin section was prepared, the petrologic
type is fairly uncertain. Actually, if there is a lot of weathering,
even the chemical group can be more uncertain than usual.
Jeff
On 11/6/2011 11:28 AM, Michael Gilmer wrote:
Hi Gang,
Several new meteorites were added to the Met Bulletin yesterday. Many
of these have something new I have never seen before. There is a "~"
(tilde) in the type. For example -
Acfer 393 (H~6) - obvious this means the petrologic type is
"approximately" 6, but how/why is this being used in the nomenclature?
Were stones like this ambiguous in some way and the exact type could
not be determined? Or, is this some new naming convention we will see
more of?
Here is a link to the new meteorites -
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=%2A&sfor=names&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=2&pnt=Normal%20table&dr=&page=0
All of them, except for two, have this tilde in the type.
Best regards,
MikeG
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Galactic Stone& Ironworks - Meteorites& Amber (Michael Gilmer)
Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
