Hi, 

That's very funny---and not just!!!

Related to the foregoing, I just heard from the owner of the small 4.195kg 
specimen.  He confirmed it's extremely fresh, that it has approximately 50% 
crust and that he acquired it from Al Lang (who purchased it at the Macovich 
Auction previously referred to) and that a picture of it can be seen on Al's 
site:  http://www.nyrockman.com/museum-12.htm


All the best / d 



On Nov 21, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Yinan Wang wrote:

> Get out your CSI kit and check for blood using Luminol on your fusion
> crusted pieces! :)
> 
> -Yinan
> 
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Darryl Pitt <dar...@dof3.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Don't put much faith in this particular recollection, but I seem to recall 
>> that we don't know.  I'm already back in touch with Professor Ferrin and 
>> will attempt to answer all....it's my hope to induce him to write the 
>> comprehensive piece previously referred to.   ;-)
>> 
>> Best / d
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 21, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Michael Blood wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Darryl,
>>>        Thanks for the added info.
>>>        Can you tell us if the material "out there" is from the actual
>>> Hammer stone that killed the cow - or is some of it so and the rest
>>> From additional "rocks" of the fall?
>>>        This would be valuable to know.
>>>        Thanks, Michael
>>> 
>>> On 11/20/11 11:03 PM, "Met. Darryl Pitt" <dar...@dof3.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> VALERA REVISITED
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> While not among my favorite stories, as you'll soon discover---I have no 
>>>> doubt
>>>> whatsoever Valera killed a cow.  In brief, there was far more data 
>>>> collected
>>>> than the affidavit (which was one person's mere summary of events).
>>>> 
>>>> Here's the story:
>>>> 
>>>> Shepherded by Marty Zinn---the impresario of the Tucson Mineral and Fossil
>>>> Shows---Valera was first offered at the Macovich Auction 11 or 12 Tucson's
>>>> ago. Professor Ignacio Ferrin---a Venezuelan astronomer...and quite the
>>>> gentleman....acquired the meteorite after word of its existence wound its 
>>>> way
>>>> to him.  Marty heard from Professor Ferrin who directed him to me, and he
>>>> consigned Valera to our auction.
>>>> 
>>>> For those who are unaware, the clavicle of an otherwise healthy cow was
>>>> shattered and odd stones---only much later determined to be 
>>>> meteoritic---were
>>>> found near the carcass. The sonic phenomena associated with a meteorite 
>>>> fall
>>>> were experienced.  Two large fragments from one mass were recovered (~35 
>>>> and
>>>> 7.5 kg), and left outside, one of which was used as a doorstop over a 
>>>> period
>>>> of years---I imagine the lighter of the two.  A third smaller specimen 
>>>> which I
>>>> vaguely recall as being pretty much complete had been brought inside and 
>>>> was
>>>> quite fresh.  The specimens in circulation come from the larger fragments.
>>>> 
>>>> Professor Ferrin gathered far more information other than his procurement 
>>>> of
>>>> the affidavit.  He has long been exasperated by the ongoing questioning of
>>>> Valera's "killer" provenance by the meteorite collecting community, and has
>>>> gone on-record addressing this topic more than once.
>>>> 
>>>> There are two important points worth mentioning here---both of which are
>>>> rather ironic.
>>>> 
>>>> 1.  It's important to recall that Ferrin was informed that the farm owner 
>>>> on
>>>> whose property the meteorite fell, physician Argimiro Gonzalez, didn't 
>>>> think
>>>> anything at all of this event.  Dr. Gonzalez was well aware that rocks fell
>>>> out of the sky, and so it seemed entirely reasonable to him that such 
>>>> impacts
>>>> would occasionally result in fatalities.  Without the rocks ever having 
>>>> been
>>>> analyzed, Gonzalez, and later his family, considered the rocks as
>>>> extraterrestrial curiosities---a conclusion which resulted from a dead 
>>>> animal
>>>> which had been pulverized by blunt force trauma whose instrument rested
>>>> nearby.  It was the simplest explanation and somewhat a different tack than
>>>> would be taken by the meteorite community:  simply expressed, Gonzalez
>>>> concluded as a result of a death that what he had must be a meteorite.  It 
>>>> was
>>>> many years later that Ferrin heard the story, confirmed Gonzalez's 
>>>> hypothesis
>>>> and facilitated Valera's classification.
>>>> 
>>>> 2.   Every few years I have to admit to having undermined Valera's 
>>>> exceptional
>>>> provenance, and here's how:
>>>> 
>>>> The larger of the two massess did not sell at our auction (it was a big 
>>>> rock
>>>> and pricey---while extremely inexpensive on a per/gram basis) and Ferrin
>>>> suddenly found himself in an unexpected financial bind.  He did not have
>>>> particularly high expectations for how much it should sell---but he 
>>>> absolutely
>>>> expected it would sell, and now he was stuck---and he didn't want to take 
>>>> 40+
>>>> kg of rocks back to Venezuela.  I felt badly as I was confident it would 
>>>> sell,
>>>> and informed Ferrin of the same prior to his decision to bring Valera to
>>>> Arizona.  So I decided I would purchase it---but by doing so I now put 
>>>> myself
>>>> in a huge financial pinch.  So what did I do?  The most foolish thing I've
>>>> ever done in meteorites:  while I don't recall the precise numbers, I sold 
>>>> a
>>>> portion of the rock to another dealer for about my cost...perhaps a dollar 
>>>> a
>>>> gram, as I recall, and then we both sold Valera super-cheaply.
>>>> Percentage-wise we made a nice return, but the fact is that by having 
>>>> offered
>>>> it so ine
>>>> xpensively, a perceived valuation was created for a meteorite that should 
>>>> be
>>>> selling today for easily $250+/g.
>>>> 
>>>> If you have a specimen of Valera---treasure it.   If you don't have one, 
>>>> you
>>>> might consider getting some from somewhere as the price has been rapidly
>>>> escalating of late.  This past June at a Heritage Auction, a 309 gram 
>>>> specimen
>>>> sold for $5,975 or about $20/g.  I'm informed that small specimens today
>>>> typically sell for $25/gram and more---and as you know, getting from 
>>>> $2.50/g
>>>> to $25/g is the hard part.
>>>> 
>>>> I'll never forget when I was on the exhibit floor at a Bonhams sale a 
>>>> couple
>>>> of years back and someone declared, "I don't think Valera killed a 
>>>> cow---it's
>>>> selling for MUCH too little for having done so."  That was such a funny 
>>>> notion
>>>> to me...how MY screw-up fueled an inaccurate impression.   (I did not 
>>>> mention
>>>> my role to the fellow   ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> All the best / Darryl
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 20, 2011, at 12:51 AM, MexicoDoug wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dear List;
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have a question about the cow killing incident.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The meteorite fell in 1972.  I understand from rumors that it is 
>>>>> absolutely a
>>>>> confirmed cow killer.  But the document doesn't read as an absolute fact, 
>>>>> but
>>>>> rather circumstantial evidence (which as a meteorite collector 
>>>>> appreciating
>>>>> the size of the mass I want to believe quite strong).
>>>>> 
>>>>> The affidavit was signed in 2001, after the Doctor on whose property the
>>>>> meteorite landed had died.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yet when I heard this, it was explained to me that a doctor had pronounced
>>>>> the cow dead and there was injury visible on the cow caused by the falling
>>>>> mass (a 50 kg stone).  I always thought that a Doctor actually swore to 
>>>>> the
>>>>> wound on the cow and was convinced it was caused by the stone, since a 
>>>>> doctor
>>>>> would be expected to have a good idea of what such a wound would look 
>>>>> like.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This thread just prompted me to me read the affidavit.  It doesn't say
>>>>> anything about wounds on the cow.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The affidavit was by the Doctor's visitor, and specifically does not even
>>>>> mention that the doctor made any opinion about the meteorite killing the 
>>>>> cow.
>>>>> But does mention the doctor had owned the property and passed away
>>>>> subsequently.  No one from the Doctor's family, just the visitor, Juan
>>>>> Dionicio, commenting 30 years later says it "appeared" (presumably him 
>>>>> since
>>>>> he doesn't mention the doctor) the cow was killed by the rock when he saw 
>>>>> it
>>>>> the next day.  It does not mention any injuries or wounds to the cow at 
>>>>> all.
>>>>> Just "it appeared the cow had been killed by the rock" and also that "the 
>>>>> cow
>>>>> then eaten".
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yet I heard at the time I bought this that the cow had sustained a mortal
>>>>> injury the injury I recall being described at one point.  Why this is not 
>>>>> in
>>>>> the document? ... has me thinking something must be missing?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is this the only document that discusses the claim of a cow being killed?
>>>>> Because it seems to me people have much more information than is 
>>>>> contained in
>>>>> the affidavit.  (But I've run up enough against rumors to believe that 
>>>>> it's
>>>>> easily possible for the rumors to just be taller tales down the line).  
>>>>> Was
>>>>> there a newspaper article in the 70's or anything predating this, or were
>>>>> there any other witnesses besides Juan Dionicio, the mysterious guest who 
>>>>> it
>>>>> sounds spent several nights on the good doctor's ranch?  I'd really like 
>>>>> to
>>>>> know.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kindest wishes
>>>>> Doug
>>>>> 
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>> Visit the Archives at
>>>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>>>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>> 
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> Visit the Archives at
>>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more
>>> than standing in a garage makes you a car.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________________________
>> Visit the Archives at 
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> 

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to