""hypothesis" regarding Bonita Springs"

Hi Mike, honestly, in the corrosive Florida coastal soils, it seems almost too good to be true considering the meteorite has a lot of iron through. Seems the finder may not have been an academic. You know these tall tales that can develop when somebody finds a space rock or wrong, the tales get bigger down the line. I don't know anything about these two meteorites, as I avoid like the plague anthing that had been subjected to the likes of anything close to the disasterous effects of the Florida Intemperie that is both Bonita Springs and Grayton Beach, but both were supposedly found in midden mounds near skeletons (and the latter apparently seen by Povenmire after being found by two former Apollo guys treasure hunting by the beach, huh ;-).

If Hal didn't doubt the Grayton account it'll have to do okay but treasure seekers, salt soaked meteorite and space scientists, indian mounds make for colorful yarn, well, we have their word.

They are both H5, too, so perhaps they are paired? I wonder if it has been checked. That would be a coup if they were and your Florida (or Georgia or Alabama) strewn field suspicion might gain more steam! After metal detecting in coastal Florida soils myself, for years and years, I can personally tell you that any iron subjected to this in an aerobic or open environment is reduced to powder around a mineralized shale core in less than 100 years.

Kindest wishes
Doug

looks like your message made it through fine by itself


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Gilmer <[email protected]>
To: MexicoDoug <[email protected]>
Cc: Meteorite-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Apr 30, 2012 1:28 pm
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite


Hi Doug and List,

Your comments about the 61kg Camp Verde iron call to mind a similar
thought I had about the Bonita Springs chondrite.  Bonita Springs is a
42kg stone, and the current consensus is that the stone was
transported to it's eventual place of discovery in a pre-Calusa mound
in southern Florida.

I would argue against Bonita Springs being transported a great
distance for two reasons :

1) the pre-Calusa Indians of Florida were very war-like and did not
engage in trade with tribes from outside the region.

2) the weight of the stone seems (to me) to be too heavy to transport
great distances during a period prior to the introduction of horses to
North America by the Europeans.  I just cannot imagine an Indian
carrying around this ~100 pound rock for any extended period of time -
unless it was witnessed to fall.  Unlike a pallasite that has olivine
crystals visible on the outer surface, a typical stone chondrite would
not inspire worship as an other-wordly object - unless it was seen to
fall.

On the basis of those two points, I would argue that Bonita Springs is
a fall local to the general area where it was eventually found, or at
the very least from somewhere within the domain of the tribe who
buried it.

Given that ~100 pound chondrites rarely fall alone, it is not unlikely
that a lost strewnfield of H5 chondrites exists somewhere in Florida.

Whatever the case, I am greatly interested in the Indian folklore of
meteorites and would be keen to hear the thoughts of others on my
"hypothesis" regarding Bonita Springs.

Best regards,

MikeG

PS - my posts are not appearing on the List (I'm being moderated
perhaps?), so if Doug or someone else could please forward this to the
List, it would be appreciated.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Galactic Stone & Ironworks - MikeG

Web: http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter: http://twitter.com/GalacticStone
RSS: http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 4/30/12, MexicoDoug <[email protected]> wrote:
Interesting though these are likely three different types of human
weathering (wearing).

w1: Here's a nice picture of the Canyon Diablo (Camp Verde iron) piece
in which listmembers can appreciate these comments regarding possible
handling (rubbing, perhaps along these line suggested something
similar
to a tradition of receiving sacrament (Eucharist (sp?)) some Mexican
Catholic churches when a transmuted plaster-Jesus is kissed by nearly
everyone attending lined up single file - causing wear).

http://books.google.com/books?id=xCGpmoJl2dgC&pg=PA118

w2: The perceptions of "wear " on an ancient, recovered find are of a
different nature than one with fresh fusion crust and flowlines plus,
over the stony olivine crystals of the Glorieta Mountain (Pojoaque
iron) piece what was claimed to be a thick, possible fresh fusion
crust.  But as you say they could show different sorts of handling, in
a case of a 61 kilos Camp Verde, not likely to have been carried
about!


w3: As for Anoka (Havana beads), as well as the Egyptian stuff, that's
a different type of forming and "wearing" than Pojoaque and Camp Verde
- the work in the literature and a poster on the Smithsonian website a
few years ago pairing some of those to the Anoka meteorite suggests
that the Smithsonian/UCLA/Iowa has access to two of the mentioned
beads.

"We conducted optical microscopy, SEM ele-mental and phase mapping,
electron microprobe analy-ses, LA-ICP-MS and INAA analyses of Havana
and Anoka for comparison."

ref:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1984.pdf


kindest wishes
Doug


-----Original Message-----
From: Regine P. <[email protected]>
To: MexicoDoug <[email protected]>; Meteorite-list
<[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Apr 30, 2012 2:00 am
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite


Camp Verde comes to mind, of which one side, "the backbone" as
Laurence
Garvie
calls it, seems to have been rubbed smooth. But taken its weight it
could hardly
have been carried around by a medicine man. Since I have first seen it
I have
always imagined someone taking it for its deceased child which has
fallen back
from the sky. It has a head, shoulders and a spine. Just a trifle
heavy
perhaps.



----- Ursprüngliche Message -----
Von: MexicoDoug <[email protected]>
An: [email protected]; [email protected]
CC:
Gesendet: 1:57 Montag, 30.April 2012
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite

& quot; the meteorite had been carried in a medicine bag? It doesn't
sound
implausible, but what are the clues?"

Hi, Regine, Carleton, Mike, Bernd, Jeff, David, Listers;

I would like to draw some attention to the "carried in a medicine
pouch" since Regine asked ;-)

These guys are all with the Great Spirit now, who did the
excavations, so
we're stuck analyzing something that was contermplated in the 1920's
with the baggage of nearly an intervening century.

It is quite possible, like many things, that this medicine pouch
comment is a
comment run amok as usual with meteorites, someone says something,
then it
takes
on a life of its own due to tales getting taller,even among
conservative
scientists, unintentionally, of course, everyone just takes away a
different
idea and they follow natural 'election'.

The original comment seems to be that it was carried as "medicine",
rather than in a medicine pouch.  While this seems to be a minor
difference,
it's not.  One involves an inference and the other is more of an
observation.

Nininger later (1952) expounds on the comment when discussing Native
American
meteorite collectors and the medicine pounch has by then become alive
in its
own, through no one's fault.

The concept of "medicine" doesn't necessarily require a pouch, and
may not even be in the hands of a medicine man, why, it just as well
could
have
been a chief, or a brave warrior ... and could just as well be from a
great
deal
of handling.  The observation was simply that at least three of the
protuberances above the regmaglypts depressions were highly worn from
what was

very plausibly a soft material.  To make the leap to call it a pouch,
or just
a
lot of hands ... is a good philosophical theme for a room full of
meteorite
collectors and archeaologists without Regine's magic powder burns
evidence.
But the fact was, the wear was supposedly caused from a lot of
handling or
rubbing.  That said, ablation is a strange master and it would be
verrrrry
interesting to revisit this "wear" which formed the basis of the
original archaeological comments.

What is for sure, apparently is that it was found inside the pottery
and that
in
turn in a burial ground.  So there are some Spirits floating around
it.
Perhaps
Man & Impact Ed has a theory, it's his ballywick.  But we do need to
see
it.  Carleton kindly mentions that a couple of grams were at ASU,
that makes
sense that Nininger would take some.  My fear is that calling this
pivotal
iron
"just" another synonym does no good to science if it is lost for
inspection.  Apparently the piece weighed originally 3 ounces (about
85 g),
and
it was a complete individual subject to what was speculated to be a
violent
history, that is, after Nininger figured out how Glorieta ripped
apart along
of
course with Kunz.

But not only is the mystery with the original piece, this piece is
historical
in
that it was the first specimen that was used as a keystone to pair a
pallasite

fall to a siderite fall ... and help create the need to have a single
name
with
synonyms ... how ironic, errr... palladoxical ;-)

Kindest wishes
Doug



-----Original Message-----
From: Regine P. <[email protected]>
To: MexicoDoug <[email protected]>; bernd.pauli
<[email protected]>; meteorite-list
<[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, Apr 29, 2012 7:04 pm
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite


Hi Doug, Bernd and all,

I too would like to know where this one is being kept. What baffles
me though,
how does one get to the conclusion the meteorite had been carried in
a
medicine
bag? It doesn't sound implausible, but what are the clues? Magic
powder
topping?
Is there any further info?


Regine



----- Ursprüngliche Message -----
 Von: MexicoDoug <[email protected]>
 An: [email protected]; [email protected]
 CC:
 Gesendet: 23:54 Sonntag, 29.April 2012
 Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite

 Hi Listers,

 Paired - quite likely - It has a much more interesting history than
to be
lumped
 as a synonym and IMO value as a named iron in its own right:

 This particular iron showed a lot of evidence of wear from human
handling and
 Nininger supported Mera's suggestion that it was carried in a
medicine pouch
 in Pojoaque, which makes a triangle geographically, roughly, with
Santa Fe,
 Glorieta, Mountain locality and Pojoaque pueble.  According to the
circumstances
 of the fine, it was found inside some old pottery during
excavations
at the
 Pueblo, i.e., protected, and exhibited beautiful flow lines and
notable bluish

 fresh fusion crust, indicating it was a reasonable possibility that
whoever
 found it saw it fall.  As it was found during excavations, it
raises
the
 possibility of using this to date the Glorieta Mountain fall.

 It would be nice to know where this meteorite is now.  Did it make
it
to New
 Mexico's collection?  Nininger, in 1931, saw it in Santa Fe,
specifically in
 the "Department of Anthropology", where Mera may have been
working.
 But someone else needs to sleuth a bit further from here because I
sure
 don't know where it is now, and it would be great to see it in its
present
 condition ;-), as it was cut up a bit because Nininger and others
used it to
 argue that Glorieta Mountain wasn't a siderite, but a
sidero-pallasite
 combination as well as consolidate some of the names Bernd lists
...
I think
the
 paper was 1940.

 Definitely a specimen with a very special, if not sacred, history
...

 Kindest wishes
 Doug




 -----Original Message-----
 From: Bernd V. Pauli <[email protected]>
 To: meteorite-list <[email protected]>
 Sent: Sun, Apr 29, 2012 5:03 pm
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite


 Hello Jeff, Mike, David and List,

 David wrote: "It is indeed the synonym for Glorieta"

 ... and only one out of several others:

 Albuquerque
 Canoncito
 Glorieta
 Pojoaque
 Rio Arriba
 Santa Fe
 Santa Fe County
 Trinity County

 Cheers,

 Bernd


 ______________________________________________

 Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

 ______________________________________________

 Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to