Hei Bj�rn and list Yes so far I understand it. But what is the "tecknical" background for 3.2 - 3.8 ? I would like to dig a litle bit deeper.
Thanks Lars ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bj�rn S�rheim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:42 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Petrologic types > Hei Lars, > Even finer grading, lowest value of 3.x means the chondrules > are the most distinct, higher values that they become > more 'blured'. But even 3.8 are quite distinct since > it's 3, not 4,5,6 in the first place. > > I think it's only the petrologic type 3 that have this subdivision, > it's not so much needed, or it's no so easy to make > a coherent subdivision in the less distinct 1-2 & 4-5-6. > That's as far as I understand it, at least ... > > Bj�rn S�rheim > > At 08:43 12.03.03 +0100, you wrote: > >Ho ..... sorry typing error ...... Hi > >I have been thinking - not that I do that very often - What does the > petrologic type 3.8 mean ? > >I understand the types 3-4-5-6 but when it comes to the decimals I fall off. > >Can anyone enlighten me ? (or how it is spelled) > >I just bought a NWA 987 L3.8 so I want to know more about it. > > > >Regards > >Lars > > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
