Considering the history I think Sutter's Mill is appropriate. Great PR blah blah blah. Maybe the name of the area should be changed to Carbonaceous whatever in honor of the meteorite? I don't care what it's called but I do hope some new intriguing science comes from it, although I doubt that will be the case.
---------------------------------------- > From: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 17:19:00 -0700 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER\'S MILL in MetBull > > Let's say a significant main mass was found closer to Folsom Lake, would that > change the name? Or is it based on the number known finds which has been in > the Lotus/Coloma vicinity? Does the Meteoritical Society ever change the name > after one has been established? > > > > _______________________________________________________ > Unlimited Disk, Data Transfer, PHP/MySQL Domain Hosting > http://www.doteasy.com > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
