I noticed the same thing with NWA 2995, 2996, 3190, 4503, 5151, 5152, 6252, 6554, 6555, 6831 and NWA 7173 pairing series of lunar meteorites. Half are listed from Morocco when everybody knows they all came from Algeria.
Kindest Regards, Adam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Prof. Zelimir Gabelica Université de Haute Alsace ENSCMu," <[email protected]> To: Jeff Grossman <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 11:56 AM Subject: [meteorite-list] NWAs and their country of origin Dear Jeff, list, I overlooked with curiosity the link suggested by Jeff (example of NWA 2986 described in Met Bull). Nothing to argue about the O isotopic data, all is OK there. But read the whole writeup by curiosity and note that NWA 2986 is "probably paired with NWA 2975 and related stones". Upon clicking at NWA 2975 (link given), it appears its country is Algeria, the meteorite being purchased by M. Farmer in Erfoud (Morocco) but beneath, it is said that the place op purchase is...Algeria. Nothing dramatic though somewhat confusing... Now, back to NWA 2986. If both shergottites are paired, souldn't one expect they were found in the same country ? Though the find place for NWA 2575 is referred to as Algeria while Morocco is claimed to be the find place of NWA 2986 ... Strange again, this could suggest to some readers that both were possibly found somewhere near the border of the two countries (logically, where they fell...) Both were purchased (at different moment) in the same city (Erfoud) by the same person (Farmer). Though not sure the seller was the same (only Mike can tell). It is possible the seller N° 1 told Mike NWA 2975 was found in Algeria and the N° 2 that NWA 2986 comes from Morocco. Or that the same seller claimed the same...Or perhaps he (or they) actually did not know at all where it was found...or forgot?...or mentined a country just by chence...or by purpose ? Why, in such a confusing case, not simply mention as country "NWA" or "Sahara", as it is often mentioned so for most of the NWAs ? Is there somebody in the NomCom supposed to correct and to address these obvious uncertainties some day ? Thanks and best wishes, Zelimir --Prof. Zelimir Gabelica Université de Haute Alsace ENSCMu, Lab. LPI-GSEC, 3, Rue A. Werner, F-68093 Mulhouse Cedex, France Tel: +33 (0)3 89 33 68 94 Jeff Grossman <[email protected]> a écrit : > If you go to any entry for which oxygen isotope data are present, you'll see > the a link to the plots, e.g.: > > NWA 2986: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=33436 > > Jeff > ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
