No one forced anyone to participate.

If something didn't sell, chances are it's because it had a high
reserve set by the seller. When you set a high reserve, you run the
risk of having no buyers, just like in any market.

I'd say a photo fee and shipping is a low price to pay for a chance to
sell something to a large audience for several times what its worth.

-Yinan

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Michael Farmer <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is a train wreck for the suppliers who had to pay to put the items in, 
> ship them from Europe and elsewhere, and pay to ship them back!
> Michael Farmer
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 14, 2012, at 7:21 PM, Yinan Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> No offense intended, but how do you interpret this auction as a train wreck?
>>
>> Having worked in the natural history auction industry, this was a very
>> good auction for everything except the high priced pieces. From what I
>> observed, the sell-through rate was probably over 80%, which is great
>> for a natural history auction. Many of the lower and middle ranged
>> items went for 3-10 times the market price.
>>
>> High priced meteorites in general don't seem to sell often at auction.
>> For example, the Willamette was very well marketed last year but did
>> not sell at $650,000. Looking at past auctions, it seems $90,000 to be
>> the top price for a meteorite sold at auction in the past few years,
>> at least with this auction house.
>>
>> Personally I think the market for extreme high end meteorites may not
>> be well established in auction houses yet. Yes, someone will (and has)
>> shell out up to 2 million for a dinosaur at auction but won't do the
>> same for a meteorite.
>>
>> -Yinan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Adam Hupe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I think the timing of this auction during the middle of a political 
>>> campaign might account for the train wreck witnessed today or the economy 
>>> is worse off then anybody could imagine. Prices were all over the place, 
>>> some excellent, some poor but not a single item exceeded $50,000.00 even 
>>> with the huge buyer's premium in place.  A few of my friends watched parts 
>>> of this auction on CNN and thought many of the descriptions should have 
>>> been based on the importance of the items instead of comparing them to 
>>> famous artwork.
>>>
>>> All of the big auction houses are struggling right now from what I have 
>>> read.  Hopefully things will settle back down after the election.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Adam
>>> ______________________________________________
>>>
>>> Visit the Archives at 
>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> ______________________________________________
>>
>> Visit the Archives at 
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to