They are certainly not.
And who was it that brought forward this gelogical analysis to the wider
scientific community. It was me. I certainly didn't do any science on it.
I found it on their site. And posted it here. New Scientist then wrote
their first positive
scientific article as Carancas being truly a meteorite impact site.
What was your role in this, I don't remember you being involved?
You didn't like anyone retelling the Carancas story from that perspective, huh?
The story was goofy from the point of the combined western scientific
establishment,
and it would serve to their credit to go into it and analyse why it did
happen as it did.
And not repeating another pack of wolves rush again.
Bjørn Sørheim
--------------------------
Ok, you've gone off the deep end and will now be officially considered
goofy. Your remarks on Carancas are just dumb.
Phil Whitmer
Joshua Tree Earth & Space Museum
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
