And now for something completely different ... Meteorite talk.

I am in the process of reading through a fascinating article in latest issue of 
"Meteoritics and Planetary Science" called "The Origin of Chondrules and 
Chondrites: Debris from Low Velocity Impacts Between Molten Planetisimals."

This paper is very well written and readable even by a novice such as myself. 
What I find interesting is the proposal for a (somewhat) new theory that 
chondrules did not instantly form from clumps of heated nebular dust but 
instead formed 1.5 to 2.5MY after the formation of CAIs. the paper states that 
chondrules formed from splashing when two differentiated planetisimals collided 
at a relatively slow speed of between 10 to 100m/s. Without being able to 
review the previous papers, I have to say that to me this makes a great deal of 
sense and appears to solve many of the inconsistencies that have been raised in 
some of the older books that I have read.

Note: there is a typo in the paer on page 2177. Is states "A strength of the 
splashing model is that it can explain why chondrules are mostly between 1.5 
and 2.5MYr younger than CAI ...". The sentence should read "older", no 
"younger".

Dr. Jeff Grossman, would love to hear your thoughts on this paper.

Mendy Ouzillou 
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to