Wow, that hurts.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 1, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Naveen Jain <[email protected]> wrote:

> I wonder if this the same Matin Altman who scammed me fir 400K by selling me 
> garbage with absolute guarantee to return if I was 't satisfied. He refused 
> to take the garbage back after I complained. I am out 400K and this man is a 
> scam artist.
> 
> Naveen 
> 
> On Jun 1, 2013, at 7:27 AM, "Michael Farmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Ok, so no answers then. 
> I really don't understand your wit sometimes. Sorry it is above my head.
> So you refuse to answer why you sold me plastic label when your add said best 
> provenance? Whoever bought the Bondoc and Murchison should step forward and 
> get rid of that garbage.
> I am trying to see where this mess got started. Clearly you have no interest 
> in that.
> See you in France, your piece will be hand delivered.
> Michael Farmer
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jun 1, 2013, at 7:22 AM, "Martin Altmann" <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Mike, it's enough. I'm not your Raspberry Tony.
>> 
>>> I wrote to the list because you wrote ke a very nasty private email
>> 
>> I sent you a single email, yesterday at 11:11 p.m. containing the same 
>> content about labels ect, just I wrote here today,
>> plus offering you to send the Estherville back and to refund the purchase 
>> price and the shipment costs.
>> That email didn't contain any single harsh word, neither was it nastier than 
>> the first email we wrote to the list today.
>> An answer you didn't wrote to us, instead we could read your effusions this 
>> morning on the list.
>> So stop that immature clownery or look for somebody else to play with.
>> 
>> 
>>> Where is my refund? I will be happy when my money is back in my account.
>> 
>> Your email yesterday came in half an hour earlier than our answer to you.
>> As you might now, booking period of banks is in Germany (and Europe) ending 
>> at 5:00p.m.
>> And booking takes place only on working days not on weekends.
>> For accounting and tax purposes we have to withdraw each Paypal-payment onto 
>> our bank accounts.
>> So we have first to refill the paypal-account again, which takes 2 working 
>> days.
>> Hence probably Wednesday you'll get your refund,
>> 
>> Which btw. matches the 5 days you had needed to pay the specimen.
>> 
>> Else, much fun still in continuing,
>> I won't support you in that,
>> as in past you often enough you talked yourself in a ride or fall on this 
>> list,
>> and anyway I trust enough in the competence of the collectors,
>> to built their own opinion, what they will think about this.
>> 
>> So see you in Ensisheim,
>> Until then I won't be at your disposal here.
>> Have a nice day,
>> Martin
>> 
>> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: [email protected] 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Michael 
>> Farmer
>> Gesendet: Samstag, 1. Juni 2013 15:38
>> An: Martin Altmann
>> Cc: <[email protected]>
>> Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] meteorites sold from Europe, not as described
>> 
>> Martin,
>> Do you feel a plastic label printed on your home computer qualifies as an 
>> "American Meteorite Laboratory" passport as you write in your email? 
>> I can print such things in seconds, as can anyone. So by using your 
>> "usually" very high standards, I can print €500 notes on my computer, as 
>> long as I put the name of the European bank reserve on the fake, it would 
>> make it a real €500 note? I think I'll try to pass a few around at dealers 
>> tables in Ensisheim and see how many rocks I can buy.
>> Sorry but this collector is calling your "passport" a fake travel document.
>> 
>> You sold this Estherville to me as an extremely rare well documented piece, 
>> you clearly state that it is with AML labels, but there is no AML label, 
>> just a plastic modern-made card. You know it is NOT am AML label, and 
>> selling it as such is a scam. Since there is not label, no number on the 
>> stone, absolutely nothing to show provenance, clearly the entire email you 
>> spent hours writing was a sales gimmick.  You know I am a knowledgeable and 
>> serious collector, so why you would pass off this manufactured piece to me I 
>> don't know. Surely knowing my temper as you right here, you would know what 
>> the response would be? The only reason I bought it is because you stated it 
>> was AML with label. I figured that if it has an AML label then I was safe. I 
>> did not consider that I would receive a plastic card in substitute for AML 
>> documentation. I don't know who did it, or what "Romanian" collection it 
>> came from, I can't understand how you passed that off as acceptable.
>> 
>> Where is my refund? I will be happy when my money is back in my account.
>> 
>> Why you are defending these fake pieces with a story about a mislabeled 
>> meteorite I sold years ago I am not sure. The piece was cut and yes, it was 
>> in the wrong box or bag or whatever.
>> Mistake yes, fraud of making and selling fake old labels and provenance, no. 
>> I have made at least one mistake mixing up a piece, but you know what, 
>> thankfully a collector caught it, I OK'd him to cut and see and once cut we 
>> recognized the error and removed the piece. The way things should go.
>> 
>> I wrote to the list because you wrote ke a very nasty private email telling 
>> me how many decades you have been selling and how you could just resell the 
>> piece angered me. You know they are fake, now the whole list knows, you can 
>> compare your "murchison" to real murchisons and see there is no comparison. 
>> I don't want them resold onto perhaps other less knowledgable collectors. 
>> 
>> Something really really is fishy is going on here.
>> 
>> By the way, you sold me and others these pieces in this forum, so why not 
>> clear it up in this forum? 
>> I also do not want to see these things sold and resold for years to come.
>> 
>> What about the obvious fake Murchison? You don't even answer as to why you 
>> are selling such a piece.
>> 
>> I am really concerned at how this has come to pass.
>> 
>> Michael Farmer
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Jun 1, 2013, at 5:05 AM, "Martin Altmann" <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Mike and all,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> it’s really always sad, to experience, what internet did to some, 
>>> regarding communication, couth and manners.
>>> As told yesterday to you, as you are obviously not content with the 
>>> specimen, we offered you to send in back and to refund you.
>>> Your temper and your readiness to doom and damn each and everyone in 
>>> public, as soon as an opportunity shows up, is legendary on that list 
>>> here, as the archives tell manifold and that behavior caused so many 
>>> new collectors to turn their backs on to their new hobby, when they 
>>> read your endless flame wars here on the list, because they had 
>>> imagined meteorite collecting more august than to witness brawls on the 
>>> fish-market.
>>> 
>>> Here you can observe a difference about Andi’s and my notion of the 
>>> meteorite scene, we never took advantage in trying to badmouth you, 
>>> when you sold e.g. a “Bensour” of 85g to S.A. which landed with your 
>>> label at M.V., who asked you again and you identified it without 
>>> doubts as Bensour, but after he cut it, it turned out to be H and rather a 
>>> Bassikonou.
>>> 
>>> To the specimens.
>>> They originally stem from an old private collection from Hungary. A 
>>> collection from pre-desert times.
>>> As you might remember even from the times, when you were still 
>>> peddling with your little bag with your sales inventory from client to 
>>> client, in former times, the 1960s, 70s, 80s, 90s – the idea of 
>>> “pedigree”-collecting wasn’t born yet, the fascination emanating from 
>>> the specimens  themselves, the fact that they were meteorites, was for 
>>> the collectors overwhelming enough, so that they did not need the 
>>> little extra-boost of having a written note, from whom they had 
>>> acquired them (because they knew it anyway). Hence they were proud on 
>>> the specimens as they were now their specimens, so they wrote their 
>>> own labels and threw often the labels of the sellers/source away.
>>> I don’t know how many specimens you acquired from private collections 
>>> of these times, but you will agree, that the majority of such 
>>> specimens comes without any label or they come with the label of the 
>>> collector, and we at least had dozens of cases, where the old original 
>>> label was preserved, but where the collector had cut off the part with 
>>> the name of the dealer or the museum.
>>> Here with these two specimens of Estherville and Bondoc, it was a 
>>> luck, that the labels – why the collector enlarged and laminated once 
>>> them we don’t know, maybe for his collection filing box – gave the 
>>> hint, where the collector once had acquired them from.
>>> They were Huss specimens. And Huss at that time wasn’t the glorified 
>>> successor of Nininger, he was nothing else than a dealer for his 
>>> contemporaries, just like today, a Hupe, a Haiderer or a Cottingham for us.
>>> 
>>> If you take Bondoc, the specimen numbers are absolutely consistent 
>>> with all the numbers of the Huss-Bondocs offered by Geoff Notkin, or 
>>> at Arnaud in the Tricottet Collection or on Murray’s fine new 
>>> collection site or those Peter Marmet showed us.
>>> Btw. none of these is listed in the both Huss-catalogues, none of 
>>> these got a number painted on the surface by Huss.
>>> (We would have expected you to know that, as U.S.-expert)
>>> 
>>> As told, we are convinced of the authenticity of the specimens, as 
>>> well as those esteemed list members, who had them already in their hands.
>>> And as it is our policy, we offer always a return to our private buyers.
>>> So thank you Anne, Jeff and Mike for your efforts, to keep the “Market”
>>> clean, but we don’t see yet any reason for hysteria.
>>> (Aside from the likeliness, that we after 33 years of meteorite 
>>> collecting and 10+ years meteorite dealing, would have nothing better 
>>> to do, than to forge Esthervilles and Bondocs and to fake a legend, to 
>>> sell them at those cheapest prices we did).
>>> 
>>> However, and there you most probably will agree, we see no sense in a 
>>> written theoretical discussion here on the list, but like it the sober 
>>> way.
>>> You’ll bring the Estherville to Ensisheim, we got so many requests for 
>>> that very specimen and there are so many experts, who will identify it 
>>> as that, what it is, that we won’t be in no way reluctant or shy to 
>>> show the specimen to each and everyone, who wants.
>>> Therefore we will adjourn the further theatre, if you don’t mind, 
>>> until 3 weeks.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Martin & Andi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> 
>>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> ______________________________________________
>> 
>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> 
>> ______________________________________________
>> 
>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> ______________________________________________
> 
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> 
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to