Michael, No need to get all anal about the verbage, this ain't a Supreme Court
hearing. I guess I could have inserted the word "possible", maybe even used the
word "potential", but thankfully there's reasonable people who've displayed the
capability of understanding what I was getting at without the use of crystal
clear lawyer speak such as what's written in a software User Agreement. Go
ahead and critique every line and word that I wrote, I'll be the first to agree
that it's probably wrought with problems, but I'm not going to rewrite it, nor
am I going to take draft's of future documents to the english department of the
nearest college for correction before posting. By the way, I can tell the
difference between a Murchison and NWA 2086, and would you beleive I can do so
without the use of analysis. Similarly, there just so happens to be the
existence of some stones which can be determined to be type 3 without the use
of analysis, so you mean to tell me that you'd have troub
le being able to tell if a stone such as Begga was a type 3 or not without the
use of analysis? So how do you like them apples?
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
