Thank you for the apology, William; you are a true gentleman. While I disagree that any debate on this matter is superfluous (my profession requires me to be exact in my language), I am glad you successfully acquired what you were after.
Michael in so. Cal. On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:29 PM, William Feek <[email protected]> wrote: > > To friend and foe alike, > Besides the response from Mr. Mulgrew to my request, a number of you > responded in the manner I was expecting, the result being I was successful at > acquiring a few meteorites. It's that simple, I just wanted to get some > meteorites, not invite a superfluous debate. Apparently a lot of people > understood exactly what I intended for every single one of you that chose to > send images, somehow you all managed to send nothing but images of exactly > what I was looking for. So to those of you who responded accordingly and > without the need to read anything more into my simple request, thank you very > much, it was a pleasure to do business with you. This may come as a surprise > after all I've said, but I do admit to having overreacted to Mr. Mulgrew's > response, I amit I could just as easily have been diplomatic in expressing my > dislike, I could also have chose to say nothing at all, so I do apologize for > that not only to Mr. Mulgrew specifically, but also to everyone else on the > list for w as > ting their time with my unnecessary rant. I also want to give credit where > credit is due, Mr. Mulgrew didn't respond to my rant, he could have > retaliated, but he didn't, and I can applaud that. > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
