Being a journalist (photographer at a newspaper) I can't believe the Portland paper would run this without at least a comment from the "science side" saying Bigfoot has never been proven to exist or that something appearing fossil-like doesn't necessarily make it a fossil. We can only hope educated readers will take notice and write letters to the editor and complain on the phone. Bob
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Adam Hupe <[email protected]> wrote: > We will probably see it on eBay next week labeled "Disarticulated Big Foot > Skull" likely killed during a mating ritual judging from the huffed look on > its face forever captured during the beginning of the fossilization period. > An alternative may be that he was wiped out by a meteorite impact during the > greater Dreyus period. > > He may have taken it to a university and they told him to get back on his > meds, stop sniffing the sauce and please throw that hat in the trash. Either > way, only the press will listen and encourage people like this because many > "journalist" simply do not care what they put into print. > > Adam > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
