Mendy,
Not to meddle in other people's classifications, but to me the
geochemistry and mineralogy does look like a brachinite and not a
diogenite.
Carl

*************************************
Carl B. Agee
Director and Curator, Institute of Meteoritics
Professor, Earth and Planetary Sciences
MSC03 2050
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque NM 87131-1126

Tel: (505) 750-7172
Fax: (505) 277-3577
Email: a...@unm.edu
http://meteorite.unm.edu/people/carl_agee/



On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Mendy Ouzillou <ouzil...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Can someone please clarify why this is listed as a Brachinite instead of 
> Diogenite?
>
> Based on the composition being 90% olivine, should this not be listed as a 
> dunitic diogenite?
>
>
> Mendy Ouzillou
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Fabien Kuntz <wwmeteori...@yahoo.com>
>>To: "meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com" 
>><meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
>>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 3:09 PM
>>Subject: [meteorite-list] The NWA 6435 name on MetSoc Database = Nightmare
>>
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>>because may of you asked about the statut of NWA 6435 on the Bulletin, here 
>>is the story (it have been discussed on the list with Norbert Kammel during 
>>the summer, the 9 jully, remember) :
>>
>>Maybe Jeff Grossman will explain this a different way (because at this time I 
>>have not understand all what happened), but I have a brachinite (now is the 
>>official NWA 5435) was for a time missnamed as NWA 6435 (this was the name I 
>>recieved from the classifier) !
>>
>>
>>So during a time, this meteorite had two provisionnal names (NWA 5435 and NWA 
>>6435, close in look, easy mistake) !
>>
>>At the same time the NWA 5435 number have been assigned too, to a stone of 
>>Norbert Kammel, a chondrite (this is what was discussed on the list on early 
>>july).
>>
>>
>>The official for my brachinite was choosed as NWA 5435 (it is now OFFICIAL on 
>>the Bulletin), and the Norbert chondrite was reassigned as NWA 3999...
>>
>>last year, I submitted to Tony Irving a new stone (working name K091 for 
>>Kuntz091), after preliminary work on it of Jean-Alix Barrat, and the NWA 6435 
>>was finally reassigned to this new stone, the unbrecciated diogenite I 
>>introduced today.
>>
>>
>>OK for me this is a NIGHTMARE, I just did what I had to did, and now I have 
>>to writte here a real novel to explain what happen, and collectors possibly 
>>interesting in slices of this meteorite maybe will be suspicious !
>>
>>I suppose I have to wait (month, years?) for this mistake was corrected on 
>>the Bulletin...
>>
>>Fabien
>>
>>
>>Fabien Kuntz
>>Météorites (ventes, expertise, conférences)
>>Animation scientifique et technique
>>WWMETEORITES (Siret : 511 850 612 00017)
>>www.wwmeteorites.com
>>______________________________________________
>>
>>Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>>Meteorite-list mailing list
>>Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to