One problem is that the press rarely mentions collaboration between scientists, 
collectors and finders.   The owner of the main mass may not trust their 
government and feel the need to protect his/her assets.  I am sure a lot of 
U.S. finds are not being reported or shared for the same reason. Hunters are 
keenly aware that the 10 pound limit here is just a farce.  If the U.S. 
government determines their is cultural or scientific value, then the finder is 
sure to lose their find regardless of any weight limit.  Good luck to anyone 
who finds the first American lunar.   I am sure they will be very protective 
because government officials and politicians tell lies most of the time to the 
people they "serve" and are never held accountable for it.

Some will never get the message as I still see people openly selling meteorites 
found on dry lake beds here in Nevada although they are not to be used for 
commercial purposes.  89% of the land here is B.L.M. which covers virtually all 
of the dry lake beds.


These days, No good deed goes unpunished so expecting somebody to freely 
collaborate may soon be a thing of the past.


Adam



----- Original Message -----
From: Carl Agee <[email protected]>
To: karmaka <[email protected]>
Cc: met-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New conflict concerning the Grefsen mass of the 
Oslo meteorite

Martin,

Thanks for posting! I think I was able to decipher the article's
translation. I am left with the impression that all the Norwegian
scientists are asking is that the Grefsen be classified?

I did check the MetBull and this is the result: No records found for
meteorites with names that contain "Grefsen"; No synonyms containing
"Grefsen" were found.

Seems incredibly short-sighted of the holders of the main mass not to
want it classified given that all that all they will give up is 20g!
Plus the value will be enhanced. Furthermore, this is also the type of
bad behavior that does get attention of government officials, and so
at some point they may indeed change the current "finder is owner"
rule to "finder must give all to the Kingdom of Norway".

Or perhaps this is a Norwegian turf war? Perhaps an outsider could
convince the owners to do the right thing and get it classified. Has
anyone contacted them?

Carl Agee


*************************************
Carl B. Agee
Director and Curator, Institute of Meteoritics
Professor, Earth and Planetary Sciences
MSC03 2050
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque NM 87131-1126

Tel: (505) 750-7172
Fax: (505) 277-3577
Email: [email protected]
http://meteorite.unm.edu/people/carl_agee/



2013/10/31 karmaka <[email protected]>:
> New conflict concerning the Grefsen mass of the Oslo meteorite
>
> http://translate.google.de/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nrk.no%2Fkultur%2Fkritiserer-roed-odegaard-1.11325245
>
> Martin
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Postfach fast voll? Jetzt kostenlos E-Mail Adresse @t-online.de sichern und 
> endlich Platz für tausende Mails haben.
> http://www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos
>
>
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to