"...does not say it could have occured." - Sorry, I fogot a "NOT": A low (a priori) probability does not say, the single event could _NOT_ have occurred".
Greetings, Martin Martin Neukamm <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > in the German internet forum the question arose, why there were neither a > supersonic bang nor visible luminosic effects. It looks strange that a > further skydiver appeared shortly after the stone passed the camera. But I > aggree, the statistic argument is not valid, because *every* single event in > our life can be calculated extremely improbable, a priori. If nobody wants it > to have reproduced, the (a priori) likelyhood of a single event does not say > it could have occured. > > Greetings > > Martin > ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
