Daniel

No argument from me that we should leave the original entirely as it was found, 
no matter what that object is. 

Yet, we see and read about this happening all the time. Across the northern 
part of England (and I mean England here and not the UK), the Romans built a 
large structure (it is, or was, about 120km long and reached a height of 3.5m) 
which has become known as Hadrian's Wall. It purpose was to mark the boundary 
of the Roman Empire at that time as well as act as a defensive barrier to keep 
those nasty Scots out (it failed and we got through easily enough!). Yet as 
soon as the Romans left, the local populace began to plunder and remove its 
finely wrought stonework for use as building stone. From our viewpoint in 2014, 
we are rightly appalled that this wonderful work has been plundered and 
destroyed to be remade into farm buildings and walls. Yet, who are we to 
criticise these people for utilising such a wonderful, ready-made supply of cut 
stone in order to enhance their lives (believe me life in that part of Britain 
would have been very hard - it still is)? Also are we right to criticise 
 the Inuit for using metal taken from the Cape York meteorite (and possibly 
others as well) to fashion into harpoons and tools or indeed the ancient 
Egyptians for collecting Libyan desert glass to create jewellery for the 
Pharaohs?

Cheers

Peter Davidson
Senior Curator of Minerals

National Museums Collection Centre
242 West Granton Road
Edinburgh
EH5 1JA
00 44 131 247 4283
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Meteorite-list [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Daniel Noyes via Meteorite-list
Sent: 06 August 2014 17:33
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] "Meteorite" Sculpture by Katie Paterson

Hi Graham, Peter and All,
 
I would agree that art can be a means to challenge existing concepts and 
perceptions. I think the rub in this instance is the recasting of the 
meteorite, nature's art, into its own image; a human generated meteorite clone 
so to speak. To re-create it into something more removed from itself would 
stretch the creative boundary. 
If one were to melt down an original Remington bronze sculpture and recast it 
as itself, does that really challenge artistic expression, and how is that 
different that the cheap "after" versions that one can buy that are imitations 
of the Remington original? Given the choice between an original work of art and 
its imitation, I'll take the original every time. I'm not saying there isn't 
some value in what Katie did, but I think the genuine meteorite would be more 
worthy of a trip to the space station...
 
Best regards,
Daniel   

Daniel Noyes
Genuine Moon & Mars Meteorite Rocks
[email protected]
www.moonmarsrocks.com

 
 
-------- Original Message --------




Message: 6
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 20:40:22 +0100
From: Graham Ensor <[email protected]>
To: Peter Davidson <[email protected]>
Cc: "Meteorite List \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] "Meteorite" Sculpture by Katie Paterson
Message-ID:
<cajkn+kyzojk+oqsty--esrnqyevjdklls0tzyww+nj+c9fr...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Peter/alas an artist myself working on more unusual projects with the Arts 
Council trying to find new ways of expressing ideas...trying to stretch the 
boundaries and asking "what is art?"...etc. I find this an interesting 
topic...I'm all for "art" doing what you say...but have a slight conflict here, 
being a meteorite collector and using much of what I know and see in 
meteoritics as inspiration for some of my own projects....there are so many at 
the moment just making/doing "art" to shock...and I don't really think that 
that is enough personally....and to be honest I'm not sure what she is doing is 
really very original...many artists have destroyed and rebuilt objects as 
themselves in the past in various ways....to me she is not making people think 
about the wonder of the object, where it comes from etc...it's more about 
herself....and her practice.

Now if she had prepared the meteorite in such a way to show off its wonder, or 
even just exhibited it in a gallery as is...rather than in a museum...then that 
would have asked far more questions about what art is, or what the object 
means...the recasting is not so much about the object...it is far more about 
the process and her own practice....I feel she has said far less by recasting 
it....but I suppose that's what art is about....it's more about the questions 
that a piece is asking than the answer.

Not sure what destroying something and remaking it in its own image and then 
sending it back to whence it came (partly) is really saying.....only those who 
are wise about meteorites actually understand what aspects of the object she 
has destroyed....most of the general public/other artists etc. will see the 
object as unchanged!

Graham

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Peter Davidson via Meteorite-list 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Lads and Lassies
>
> Thank you to those who replied to the e-mail I sent about the "meteorite" 
> sculpture by Katie Paterson which has been sent into space. To be honest I 
> didn't expect a positive response and that is exactly what I got. I attended 
> a talk by Katie last Saturday (2nd August) and I actually got to handle 
> several of the meteorites she has recast. An odd and slightly disconcerting 
> experience I thought. We got to chatting about possible future collaborations 
> but it remains to be seen what that might actually turn out to mean.
>
> I have always believed that it one of the purposes of art (among many other 
> things) to challenge, shock and discomfort people and ideas by presenting the 
> familiar in a new and unfamiliar way - to make people rethink their ideas and 
> to challenge them to take stock of their old values. This particular project 
> does seem to have raised a few eyebrows and rattled a few cages. I am mulling 
> over the idea of asking Katie if I could present these items at Ensisheim one 
> year.
>
> Cheers
>
> Peter Davidson
> Senior Curator of Minerals
>
> National Museums Collection Centre
> 242 West Granton Road
> Edinburgh
> EH5 1JA
> 00 44 131 247 4283
> [email protected]
>
>
> Discover the treasures of China's Ming dynasty at the National Museum of 
> Scotland.
> Ming: The Golden Empire, 27 June-19 October 2014, www.nms.ac.uk/ming
>
> National Museums Scotland, Scottish Charity, No. SC 011130 This 
> communication is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the 
> addressee please inform the sender and delete the email from your system. The 
> statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and 
> do not necessarily reflect those of National Museums Scotland. This message 
> is subject to the Data Protection Act 1998 and Freedom of Information 
> (Scotland) Act 2002. No liability is accepted for any harm that may be caused 
> to your systems or data by this message.
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Discover the treasures of China's Ming dynasty at the National Museum of 
Scotland.
Ming: The Golden Empire, 27 June-19 October 2014, 
www.nms.ac.uk/ming 

National Museums Scotland, Scottish Charity, No. SC 011130
This communication is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the 
addressee please inform the sender and delete the email from your system. The 
statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and 
do not necessarily reflect those of National Museums Scotland. This message is 
subject to the Data Protection Act 1998 and Freedom of Information (Scotland) 
Act 2002. No liability is accepted for any harm that may be caused to your 
systems or data by this message.
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to