This is the same old shtick. Just another way to confuse what has to be learned
the hard way, by educating yourself before considering the purchase of ANY
"meteorite".
Who or what is trustworthy? It isn't obvious. This sounds like a case that
allows for confusion and defends chaos rather than finding fault with the
problems that can never be solved by buying anything other than substantial
specimens from who/whom at all? Misrepresentation will always be there whether
intentional or not.
IMCA was a worthy attempt to establish integrity but in the end the IMCA can
only control their own. There are endless swindlers in this world and crumb
buying is an almost certain waste of money. It has and will continue to add
pollution to meteorite collecting forever.
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
