Thank you Jeff,

For the clarity that a 'paper' hasn't been published about Al Haggounia and/or 
NWA 2828 not being an Aubrite and 'simply' an Enstitite, albeit a very 
interesting one!! I have CCed Tony Irvibg and Ted Bunch on this because they 
have performed extensive research in this most interesting meteorite. Sorry I 
do not have a link to Ted's web page dedicated to 'The NWA 2828 / Al Haggounia 
Problem' as I am out of town and limited on a cell phone.

As for the DCAs, I am still confused at to the naming structure and why the new 
'official' DCA finds would even have 'NWA' associated when the numbers are so 
close to current one ( almost at 9000 ). I will Havel read the report when I 
have access to a computer and have time.

Thanks for all of your help everyone!!

Best regards,
Greg Hupe

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 15, 2015, at 4:08 AM, Jeff Grossman via Meteorite-list 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> No, the DCAs will simply require coordinates, like everywhere else.  The 
> proof condition is dropped.  The NWA 9000s will be skipped.
> 
> Believe it or not, nobody has submitted a request to reclassify Al Hag 001 or 
> its siblings.  Has there been a paper published on it?  All I'm finding are 
> abstracts.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Feb 15, 2015, at 5:08 AM, Greg Hupe via Meteorite-list 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello All,
>> 
>> In a quick glance at comments tonight, but not reading the link to new 
>> rules, I believe starting the new DCA mets with 'coordinates & proof' to be 
>> confusing. Why start the DCAs at "NWA 10,000..." when in short time the 
>> 'non-proof' mets will reach the tried and true 'NWA' naming system and 
>> surpass 10,000? Why not simply add the 'sub group' "DCA" after "NWA"...  
>> example... NWA-DCA 0001, NWA-DCA OOO2... and so on....
>> 
>> As for re-evaluating certain classifications for renaming, how about we fix 
>> that Al Haggounia problem, it is still not an 'Aubrite'?? NWA 2828 was 
>> rewritten in Abstract that the original 'Aubrite' designation was made with 
>> original type sample, but after subsequent material was cut chondrules were 
>> discovered and the correct science was selflessly announced...
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Greg Hupe
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Carl Agee via Meteorite-list 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/MetBullNews.php?id=3
>>> 
>>> *************************************
>>> Carl B. Agee
>>> Director and Curator, Institute of Meteoritics
>>> Professor, Earth and Planetary Sciences
>>> MSC03 2050
>>> University of New Mexico
>>> Albuquerque NM 87131-1126
>>> 
>>> Tel: (505) 750-7172
>>> Fax: (505) 277-3577
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> http://meteorite.unm.edu/people/carl_agee/
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> 
>>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> ______________________________________________
>> 
>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> ______________________________________________
> 
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to