Thank you Frank.
And here are 2 more:
Northwest Africa 8655 ** found 2014 (Northwest Africa) LL5-melt breccia 6.44 kg
Northwest Africa 1701 ** NWA 1701 Ordinary chondrite (LL5, impact melt
breccia)
Amazing what you find when you search the Met.Database.!
Anne M. Black
www.IMPACTIKA.com
impact...@aol.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Cressy <fcre...@prodigy.net>
To: Graham Ensor <graham.en...@gmail.com>; Anne Black <impact...@aol.com>
Cc: meteorite list <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>; Michael Farmer
<m...@meteoriteguy.com>
Sent: Mon, Feb 23, 2015 8:24 am
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk is not a impact-melt?
Paragould also has a significant amount of melt breccia areas, and an LL5 to
boot.
Frank
On Monday, February 23, 2015 4:07 AM, Graham Ensor via Meteorite-list
<meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
The Met Bulletin description contains the sentence "A significant
portion (1/3) of the stones consist of a dark, fine-grained impact
melt containing mineral and chondrule fragments."
Graham
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Anne Black via Meteorite-list
< meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
> Frankly,
> If Chelyabinsk is not an impact-melt then frankly I don't know what is!
> Look for yourselves: http://www.impactika.com/chely-slice.jpg
> And dozens of other pictures right on the Met. Database.
> And the classification was done by the Vernadsky Institute.
>
>
> Anne M. Black
> www.IMPACTIKA.com
> impact...@aol.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Farmer via Meteorite-list <
> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
> To: < meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> <
> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Sun, Feb 22, 2015 9:38 pm
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk is not a impact-melt?
>
>
> Steve and Quinn Arnold are telling us on Facebook that Chelyabinsk is not an
> impact-melt breccia, and that Tony Irving confirms that. Is that true? Funny
> when I google it, hundreds of papers discuss the metric ton of known
> Chelyabinsk as all being impact-melt material. Of course, those of us who
> went there and have a large amount of Chelyabinsk can tell you that it sure
> seem full of clasts, and melt pockets and shock veins. Since his kickstarter
> rock seems to be the only known LL5 melt (according to the (met. Bull.)and
> Chelyabinsk seems to be nothing of the sort, it is amazing to me.
> Comments? Anyone in this list, scientist or collector know something I don't,
> that Chelyabinsk is a "non" impact-melt meteorite?
> Micael Farmer
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
