Folks....
NWA 5000 is a spectacular meteorite whose resume did not require enhancing. I wholly agree there is no lunar that's nicer. That said, Kalahari 009 exists —it's a fact. I am not going to climb into the details other than to share that the owner is a paranoid eccentric who has gone to great lengths to remain anonymous. That's all that is at work here. Nothing nefarious....just put Occam's Razor back into play. In addition, I know of two other lunar masses that are larger than NWA 5000—one reassembled and one intact. On Jun 7, 2016, at 10:07 PM, Michael Farmer via Meteorite-list <[email protected]> wrote: > I just now realized how I had left out an important piece of the email > earlier. > The Kalahari lunars have never been seen or exhibited publicly. I and many > others have serious doubts about even their existence. > The tiny samples shows in photos show a very ugly lunar. Those could never be > compared to NWA 5000 in value or any other way. I forgot to add the name in > my last email. Please don't get confused. If anyone claims to have a lunar > nicer or larger please put it on the scale and show it. Otherwise it's all > just talk. > Michael Farmer > > > > Sent from my iPad > ______________________________________________ > > Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the > Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
