http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=6734

NASA's Curiosity Rover Sharpens Paradox of Ancient Mars
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
February 6, 2017

Fast Facts:

* Curiosity rover findings add to a puzzle about ancient Mars because 
the same rocks that indicate a lake was present also indicate there was 
very little carbon dioxide in the air to help keep a lake unfrozen.

* No carbonate has been found definitively in rock samples analyzed 
by Curiosity.

* A new study calculates how much carbon dioxide could have been 
in the ancient atmosphere without resulting in carbonate detectable by 
the rover: not much.

Mars scientists are wrestling with a problem. Ample evidence says ancient 
Mars was sometimes wet, with water flowing and pooling on the planet's 
surface. Yet, the ancient sun was about one-third less warm and climate 
modelers struggle to produce scenarios that get the surface of Mars warm 
enough for keeping water unfrozen.

A leading theory is to have a thicker carbon-dioxide atmosphere forming 
a greenhouse-gas blanket, helping to warm the surface of ancient Mars. 
However, according to a new analysis of data from NASA's Mars rover Curiosity, 
Mars had far too little carbon dioxide about 3.5 billion years ago to 
provide enough greenhouse-effect warming to thaw water ice.

The same Martian bedrock in which Curiosity found sediments from an ancient 
lake where microbes could have thrived is the source of the evidence adding 
to the quandary about how such a lake could have existed. Curiosity detected 
no carbonate minerals in the samples of the bedrock it analyzed. The new 
analysis concludes that the dearth of carbonates in that bedrock means 
Mars' atmosphere when the lake existed -- about 3.5 billion years ago 
-- could not have held much carbon dioxide.

"We've been particularly struck with the absence of carbonate minerals 
in sedimentary rock the rover has examined," said Thomas Bristow of NASA's 
Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California. "It would be really hard 
to get liquid water even if there were a hundred times more carbon dioxide 
in the atmosphere than what the mineral evidence in the rock tells us." 
Bristow is the principal investigator for the Chemistry and Mineralogy 
(CheMin) instrument on Curiosity and lead author of the study being published 
this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Curiosity has made no definitive detection of carbonates in any lakebed 
rocks sampled since it landed in Gale Crater in 2012. CheMin can identify 
carbonate if it makes up just a few percent of the rock. The new analysis 
by Bristow and 13 co-authors calculates the maximum amount of carbon dioxide 
that could have been present, consistent with that dearth of carbonate.

In water, carbon dioxide combines with positively charged ions such as 
magnesium and ferrous iron to form carbonate minerals. Other minerals 
in the same rocks indicate those ions were readily available. The other 
minerals, such as magnetite and clay minerals, also provide evidence that 
subsequent conditions never became so acidic that carbonates would have 
dissolved away, as they can in acidic groundwater.

The dilemma has been building for years: Evidence about factors that affect 
surface temperatures -- mainly the energy received from the young sun 
and the blanketing provided by the planet's atmosphere -- adds up to a 
mismatch with widespread evidence for river networks and lakes on ancient 
Mars. Clues such as isotope ratios in today's Martian atmosphere indicate 
the planet once held a much denser atmosphere than it does now. Yet theoretical 
models of the ancient Martian climate struggle to produce conditions that 
would allow liquid water on the Martian surface for many millions of years. 
One successful model proposes a thick carbon-dioxide atmosphere that also 
contains molecular hydrogen. How such an atmosphere would be generated 
and sustained, however, is controversial.

The new study pins the puzzle to a particular place and time, with an 
on-the-ground check for carbonates in exactly the same sediments that 
hold the record of a lake about a billion years after the planet formed.

For the past two decades, researchers have used spectrometers on Mars 
orbiters to search for carbonate that could have resulted from an early 
era of more abundant carbon dioxide. They have found far less than anticipated.

"It's been a mystery why there hasn't been much carbonate seen from orbit," 
Bristow said. "You could get out of the quandary by saying the carbonates 
may still be there, but we just can't see them from orbit because they're 
covered by dust, or buried, or we're not looking in the right place. The 
Curiosity results bring the paradox to a focus. This is the first time 
we've checked for carbonates on the ground in a rock we know formed from 
sediments deposited under water."

The new analysis concludes that no more than a few tens of millibars of 
carbon dioxide could have been present when the lake existed, or it would 
have produced enough carbonate for Curiosity's CheMin to detect it. A 
millibar is one one-thousandth of sea-level air pressure on Earth. The 
current atmosphere of Mars is less than 10 millibars and about 95 percent 
carbon dioxide.

"This analysis fits with many theoretical studies that the surface of 
Mars, even that long ago, was not warm enough for water to be liquid," 
said Robert Haberle, a Mars-climate scientist at NASA Ames and a co-author 
of the paper. "It's really a puzzle to me."

Researchers are evaluating multiple ideas for how to reconcile the dilemma.

"Some think perhaps the lake wasn't an open body of liquid water. Maybe 
it was liquid covered with ice," Haberle said. "You could still get some 
sediments through to accumulate in the lakebed if the ice weren't too 
thick."

A drawback to that explanation is that the rover team has sought and not 
found in Gale Crater evidence that would be expected from ice-covered 
lakes, such as large and deep cracks called ice wedges, or "dropstones," 
which become embedded in soft lakebed sediments when they penetrate thinning 
ice.

If the lakes were not frozen, the puzzle is made more challenging by the 
new analysis of what the lack of a carbonate detection by Curiosity implies 
about the ancient Martian atmosphere.

"Curiosity's traverse through streambeds, deltas, and hundreds of vertical 
feet of mud deposited in ancient lakes calls out for a vigorous hydrological 
system supplying the water and sediment to create the rocks we're finding," 
said Curiosity Project Scientist Ashwin Vasavada of NASA's Jet Propulsion 
Laboratory, Pasadena, California. "Carbon dioxide, mixed with other gases 
like hydrogen, has been the leading candidate for the warming influence 
needed for such a system. This surprising result would seem to take it 
out of the running."

When two lines of scientific evidence appear irreconcilable, the scene 
may be set for an advance in understanding why they are not. The Curiosity 
mission is continuing to investigate ancient environmental conditions 
on Mars. It is managed by JPL, a division of Caltech in Pasadena, for 
NASA's Science Mission Directorate, Washington. Curiosity and other Mars 
science missions are a key part of NASA's Journey to Mars, building on 
decades of robotic exploration to send humans to the Red Planet in the 
2030s. For more about Curiosity, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/curiosity

Learn about NASA's Journey to Mars at:

http://www.nasa.gov/journeytomars

News Media Contact
Guy Webster
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
818-354-6278 / 818-393-9011
guy.webs...@jpl.nasa.gov

Laurie Cantillo / Dwayne Brown
NASA Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1077 / 202-358-1726
laura.l.canti...@nasa.gov / dwayne.c.br...@nasa.gov

Abigail Tabor
Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif.
650-604-0643
abigail.s.ta...@nasa.gov

______________________________________________

Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the 
Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to