The photo of Haig shows concave depressions, not bulbous lumps. It’s not good photo perspective.
The closest visual match to this stone would be something like Patos de Minas (the octahedrite), but comparing a relatively fresh desert stone with fusion crust — to a fissured, decomposing iron from a much more wet climate doesn’t make sense. Consensus when this NWA surfaced on Facebook was that it was a broken oriented stone, ‘creatively’ altered to disguise the damage. Without a real forensic assessment, I would not feel at all comfortable calling it natural. It may technically be “art.” I don’t think the bidders in these auctions know or care either way. Jason On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:42 PM Paul Gessler via Meteorite-list < [email protected]> wrote: > Want everyone's opinion / on this highly unusual morphology. > I don't doubt it is a real meteorite at all just that one side looks > altered > or is HUGELY UNIQUE > Christies is currently selling it and gives a cryptic explanation for its > shape as "Modern burnishing" > What the hell does that mean exactly????? > they also mention it could be naturally ventifacted.??????????? > > Either way I have never seen anything quite like it in the meteorite world. > > Anyone else have an explanation ... please chime in on this. > > > https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/deep-impact-lunar-rare-meteorites/evoking-sculpture-ken-price-exotic-meteorite-morphology-nwa-13203-38/82821 > > Thanks > Paul Gessler > > ______________________________________________ > > Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the > Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >
______________________________________________ Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
