|
Mark:
Hello, you pose an interesting observation and
question. The first thing which comes to mind is that predictions
based on statistics are more likely to fall within predicted ranges when
relatively high numbers are involved. I don't recall off-hand how many of
each (lunar and Martian) meteorites there are, but the numbers are fairly
small. If we flip a coin all day we should come out to something
approaching 50/50 heads to tails. But within those results there may
be strings of 10 tails and 2 heads, or 25 heads and 13 tails etc.
When you throw other factors into the mix, some of which you mentioned, I don't
think we'll have an accurate assessment until many more specimens are
collected.
George
|
- [meteorite-list] Lunar/Martian controversy Mark Jackson
- Re: [meteorite-list] Lunar/Martian controversy ks1u
- Re: [meteorite-list] Lunar/Martian controversy Mark Jackson
- Re: [meteorite-list] Lunar/Martian controversy Ron Baalke
- Re: [meteorite-list] Lunar/Martian controversy j . divelbiss
- AW: [meteorite-list] Lunar/Martian controversy Norbert Classen
- Re: [meteorite-list] Lunar/Martian controversy Starbits
- Re: [meteorite-list] Lunar/Martian controversy j . divelbiss
- Re: [meteorite-list] Lunar/Martian controversy Sterling K. Webb
- Re: [meteorite-list] Lunar/Martian controversy j . divelbiss
- Re: [meteorite-list] Lunar/Martian controversy Sterling K. Webb

