In a message dated 12/23/2003 6:28:29 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

> Doug,
> 
> How about a synopsis? Or is it synapses? I can't follow all 
> that.
> 
> Bill Kieskowski

OK Bill, trying:...I noticed that Ron Baalke somehow overlooked posting a recent 
research result that the Quadrantid Meteor shower, which was the final major orphan 
shower (no parent body identified that is source to the material), now has a parent, 
with good probability.  They also suggested that the parent got too close to Jupiter 
over the last few centuries in its orbit causing a considerable part to disintegrate, 
or perhaps fragment.  The orbit of the parent body was calculated and I looked at 138 
years of approaches of the object (2003 EH1) to Earth, and noticed that in 1877 
several coincidental factors lined up, so I checked Impactika.com 's website for 
falls, and on Jan 3, 1877 there was one, St. Marks (South Africa).  Then miraculously, 
Marco, one of the researchers on this discovery stepped in to answer all my questions 
eventually telling me it was a good try, but wishful thinking on my part that that 
particular fall was from 2003 EH1, considered to be a burnt out comet. I didn't accept 
no until he checked the orientation of the Earth and proved that it was unlikely, 
since the part of Earth flying through the Meteor stream orbit left by 2003 EH1 did 
not include the fall location at the fall time.  The he drew a picture to better 
appreciate this.  So now there are more questions, but we won't be spending time on 
the St Marks meteorite question since it seems far too improbably.  In other words, 
close but no cigar...so unfortunately we don't have a sample of an EH5 burnt out comet 
in St. Marks S. Africa meteorite, and it will not be worth a million times its present 
value...hope that helps.  Now it is really bedtime or I'll be seeing stars in daylight.

Saludos Doug
1�^���zX��f��)��+-1�^���zX��g�z�����ڕ�&��i��0–��X��w��f��f��X��)ߣ����+�ץ��

Reply via email to