Title: Nachricht
Dear Bernhard and List,
 
I very rarely comment from images alone as it is very difficult to assess stones from pictures.  The shape suggests a water worn pebble more than an ablative process to me. If the refractive material were meteorite metal you would get more of pull from a magnet judging from the amount present.  The things I look for are a valid fusion crust, proper shape, nickel-iron metal, shock indications and how the stone weathered.  I see nothing that indicates a meteorite to me but I have been surprised a few times in the past.  Very interesting stone whatever it turns out to be.
 
All the best,
 
Adam
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 1:38 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Help me solve a mystery - NWA mystery

Hi,
 
app. 2 weeks ago, Steve Arnold (Illinois) sold a "mystery NWA" on ebay. This is the text that came with the auction (as often with Steve, no pic):
 
"Up here for auction is a mystery.This is a 134.9 gram whole stone that has been cut by AL LANG.It is a unclassified NWA mystery stone.I had bob haag,richard norton,al lang,ed thompson,blaine reed, and a few others give thier opinion on what it might be.No one knows.It has a very rich dark brown matrix.Very few or none at all with chondrules.High in metal, but it pulls very weakly even with a strong magnet.You can be the lucky winner of this mystery stone and you can try and get it classified.It measures 6.5 cm x 5.2 cm x 3.8 cm.I will start the bidding at $1.00. Good luck."
 
Well, I bidded and won the item. Today it arrived. I had a closer look at it, took some photographs and am looking for your expertise now.
 
Let me describe the tactile impressions: The item is feels pretty cold when you hold it, and it has about the right weight for a meteorite of this size. However: the outside feels quite "soft", more like an ordinary stone than a meteorite, like a pebble that has been in the water.
 
There is indeed a lot of metal visible from the outside, but on the cut surface, the deeper you go inside, the less metal you find. A close examination with a 10x magnification showed no chondrules at all, at least for me.
 
Here are three photos of the object (they are quite large in order to reveal more details). I have brightened the photos and added some contrast and some mild sharpening, but I'd say they are true to the visual appearance of the object:
 
 
So - what's your impression? Is it a meteorite at all? What is it?
 
Bernhard

Reply via email to