Tracy wrote:

> what distinguishing visual characteristics make it different from, say,
> a piece of Bensour (which, at first glance, your new rock resembles.)

As Adam already mentioned, a magnet was not the least bit attracted
to this stone, and there is probably no trace of chondrules or chondrule
fragments. My first impression was it could be a eucrite but, of course,
I'll keep my fingers crossed for the Hupes and the Calcalong parallel !

Best wishes,

Bernd

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to