Lars & List
 
The important point is that most hor desert meteorites are not found in sandy areas ( like sans dunes) but in hard areas such as rocky fields, with most of the time clay below ( or finer soils than sand below the surface) ( The Dar Al Gani field is made of small dolomitic rocks  ( a kind of calcareous rock) lying on clay. Most of the saharan Hamadas are  similar. These soils keep the moisture when it rains and this is the cause of the weathering of the buried "half" of the meteorite. The upper part of the meteorite is in very dry atmosphere and keeps it in better state of conservation. Even if the crust is somehow blasted away by the sand wind action.
 
A typical old hot desert meteorite will present: no crust on the upper side, and some crust , but altered on the buried side, sometimes this crust will be covered with caliche.
 
Desert sand is not chemicaly agressive. Desert sand is almost pure silica ( Si O2). the color of the sand is given by oxydes in very small proportions. Often iron oxydes.  Aggresion ( and alteration ) on hot desert meteorites occurs when water is present. The fusion crust is not a propection for meteorites. It is not a sealant. Unfortunatly.
 
I only speak about stones meteorites ( Chondrites and Achondrites )  I have no experience about iron meteorites, just found one.
 
My 2 cents
 
Michel FRANCO
Hot desert hunter.
 
Caillou Noir www.caillou-noir.com
BP 16, 100 Chemin des Camp�nes
74400 Les Praz de Chamonix FRANCE
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:15 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Stones partly burried in the dessert sand

Hi All
 
I have been thinking ;-)
 
Why is it that it looks like the part of a meteorite that sticking out of the sand seems to be better preserved, than the part that is burried in the sand - and is protected from the weather.
 
My logical sense (dont laugh :-) tells me that the part that is up in the air is constantly eroded by the sand blowing over it, and gently sandblasting it - but perhaps that is the secret ?
 
Is dessert sand cemicaly agressive ?
 
It is just something I noticed, and may not allways be the case ?
 
Best wishes
Lars Pedersen

Reply via email to