Rob and List,
Thanks for the in comprehensive comparison of the Garmin GPS units. A similar comparison chart is available from REI and is a quick reference to the features, capabilities and limits of each unit.


While we're on this subject, would any one like to comment on the different software programs used in conjunction with GPS units? I have both the Garmin MapSource (1: 100,000 scale) and the TOPO! program (1: 24,000 scale) sold under the National Geographic label for individual states. Both programs are easy to use and both have lots of nice features. What I would prefer is a combination of the two so I could have access to all the features in one interface.

Anybody have any comments, good or bad, about these programs?

BTW, if you do a little shopping around, you can find pretty good deals on the Garmin units. We recently bought two Etrex Legends for $140.00 each and I've found the Vista for under $250.00

Best,
John Gwilliam

At 04:07 PM 4/7/2004, Matson, Robert wrote:
Hi All,

Wanted to thank Ron Baalke for posting the link to a Garmin GPS
comparison website:

http://www.gpsnow.com/gpscmpm.htm

For those that haven't checked it out, perhaps my analysis will save
you some time as far as the selection of a GPS unit best-suited for
meteorite recovery work.

First, my requirements:

1.  Large # of track points -- at least 2000.  For a 1-day trip, and
8 hours of active hunting, I would need 480 track points at 1-minute
temporal resolution.  So 2000 track points would support trips of up
to 4 days without computer access.

2. WAAS accuracy a must.

3.  Waypoints (for marking find locations) -- would like at least 500
active at a given time; for multi-day trips at multiple locations, it
would be nice to have 1000.

4. PC interface: USB preferred; 9-pin serial acceptable.

5. Battery life: the longer the better

6. Display: the greater the # of pixels, the better

Other features which are nice to have, but not critical:

1.  Electronic compass
2.  2-way radio with position reporting
3.  Detachable or external antenna hookup

13 units are compared at this site, three of which (the most
expensive ones) are dash-mounted, so that leaves 10.  Battery life
is only 1.5-5 hours on the Garmin iQue 3600, which is the most
expensive of the handheld models.  This is because it has a lot
of extra bells and whistles (PDA, voice recorder, MP3 player).  It
also uses a rechargeable lithium-ion battery, which adds to the
expense if you need to carry an extra one along.  Nice unit, but
overkill on features and not optimum for meteorite hunting.

That leaves 9 units, which can be separated into two groups --
those with electronic compass and barometric altimeter, and
those without:

No compass/altimeter:

                 Track  Way- Inter- Batt.               Approx.
    Garmin Unit  Pnts. Pnts. face   Life  Pixels Colors  Price
    ------------ ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ------
1.  eTrex Legend 10000  1000 9-pin   18    46080 4-gray  $200
2.  Rino 120      2048   500 9-pin   15    25600 4-gray  $250
3.  GPSMAP 76    10000  1000 9-pin   16    43200 4-gray  $300
4.  V Deluxe      3000   500 9-pin   25    40960 4-gray  $400
5.  GPSMAP 60C   10000  1000  USB    30    38400   256   $450

With compass & altimeter:

                 Track  Way- Inter- Batt.               Approx.
    Garmin Unit  Pnts. Pnts. face   Life  Pixels Colors  Price
    ------------ ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ------
6.  eTrex Vista  10000  1000 9-pin   12    46080 4-gray  $300
7.  Rino 130      2048   500 9-pin   14    25600 4-gray  $350
8.  GPSMAP 76S   10000  1000 9-pin   10    43200 4-gray  $400
9.  GPSMAP 60CS  10000  1000  USB    30    38400   256   $500

The compass feature is nice, but I don't think you'd need the
altimeter for meteorite hunting.  However, if you're planning to
use the GPS for backpacking, the altimeter would be a nice feature.
Basically you pay an extra $100 for the altimeter/compass option
($50 extra for the GPSMAP 60CS vs. 60C).

The V Deluxe has a detachable GPS antenna and includes a MapSource
CD-ROM (MapSource North America City Select).  Fancy maps are
fine for driving navigation or trail hiking, but you'll find
they're of little use for wilderness meteorite hunting.  The places
you're most likely to find meteorites are the very places that
tend to be devoid of interesting map features, so if you're only
using the GPS for meteorite hunting, I wouldn't spend a lot of
extra money on the mapping capabilities.

One thing that looks odd in these lists is that the eTrex appears
to be a better deal than the GPSMAP 76.  It has the same # of
track points and waypoints, 4-gray-scale display and 9-pin
interface, but the eTrex has slightly MORE pixels and a little
longer battery life and yet costs $100 less!  The reason for the
disparity is a "feature" I failed to include -- screen size.  The
GPSMAP 76 has a 52% larger display than the eTrex (it also has an
external antenna hookup and more route features).

That's one problem with the Rino units -- the display is puny:
only 1.4" x 1.4".  On this basis alone, I probably wouldn't buy
one.  This is unfortunate, because they do have that nice 2-way
radio and position reporting feature.

The eTrex display isn't much better -- 2.1" x 1.1" versus
2.2" x 1.6" for the GPSMAP 76.

Based on all this, my Garmin GPS recommendation would be the
GPSMAP 76 (or GPSMAP 76S if you want the altimeter/compass).
If you have young eyes, you can probably get away with spending
$100 less for the eTrex.

One other cool feature of the GPSMAP 76's: they float!  Also, I just
checked the "too low to advertise price" at the above website --
you can get the GPSMAP 76 there for only $256.90 including shipping!
(The 76S is only $316.90 including shipping.)  That's a pretty
good deal.

--Rob


______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to