J�rn Koblitz wrote: > > Correct. It simply mean that no finer classification has been done. It's just a bit > more work to get the subtype classification. A 3.0 is actually the most primitive, > most unequilibrated and rarest type of unequilibrated ordinary chondrite. > > BTW: A petrologic type 2 has never been assigned to any ordinary chondrite. Only to > carbonaceous chondrites. > > J�rn
Hi J�rn, It was proposed in a paper I read a while back that Semarkona may be consistent with a petrographic type 2 classification due to aqueous alteration. I guess it's possible. David ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
