New Scientist
May 8, 2004

Just when you thought the dust had settled on the cause of the demise 
of the dinosaurs, there's a new type of catastrophe kicking it up again. 
Forget meteorites and mega-volcanoes, Verneshots are the real culprits, 
says Kate Ravilious.

The Earth exploded under their feet. Noxious gases spouted into the 
atmosphere and quickly circulated around the globe. The ground shook with 
the force of a hundred massive earthquakes, and 20 gigatonnes of the Earth's 
crust and mantle were blasted into the sky before raining back down onto the 
surface. It was a terrible day for the dinosaurs. They never recovered.

Is this, at last, a true description of what happened 66 million years ago? 
The argument over what killed the dinosaurs has raged for 25 years, and has 
polarised into two opposing camps: a meteorite impact, or a prolonged bout of 
mega-volcanism called a continental flood basalt.

But now a team from Geomar, an earth sciences institute at Kiel University in
Germany, has come up with a completely new type of geological catastrophe to 
explain the death of the dinosaurs, as well as three previous mass extinctions. 
If they are right the culprit was neither a meteorite nor a flood basalt, but a 
colossal underground explosion called a Verneshot.

As yet the idea is in its infancy (Earth and Planetary Science Letters, VO1217, p 263).
But the Verneshot hypothesis has one big advantage over its rivals. It explains a
mystery that haunts the debate over mass extinctions: why the extinctions always
seem to coincide with both continental flood basalts and meteorite impacts when
the odds of these happening simultaneously are vanishingly slim.

In the past 400 million years there have been four major mass extinctions. Between 380 
and 364 million years ago the Frasnian-Fammenian extinction pulses wiped out 60 per 
cent of marine life. That was followed by the biggest extinction of all, when 96 per 
cent of the world's species disappeared at the end of the Permian, 251 million years 
There was another huge die-off at the end of the Triassic 201 million years ago. And 
finally, 66 million years ago, the dinosaurs and numerous other groups met their end 
the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary.

Each of these events is associated with both a meteorite impact and a continental 
flood basalt. Yet even one such double whammy is highly 
unlikely: could it really have happened four times? Meteorite impacts large enough 
to trigger a mass extinction are believed to occur less than once every 100 million 
years. Continental flood basalts, meanwhile, happen roughly once every 30 to 50 
million years and last for about a million years. "Doing a quick back-of-the-envelope 
calculation reveals that the odds of a meteorite impact occurring at the same time as 
a continental flood basalt within the last 400 million years is around 1 in 8," says 
Jason Phipps Morgan, who led the Geomar team. "Unlikely, but perhaps within the 
realm of terrestrial bad luck." But the probability of four of these coincidences 
happening within the last 400 million years is 1 in 3500.

As the evidence for this coincidence mounted, so too has the need for a way of 
explaining how it came about. And so Phipps Morgan and two of his Geomar 
colleagues, Tim Reston and Cesar Ranero, set out to find one. The result is the 
Verneshot hypothesis - and the beginning of a new and acrimonious battle in the 
war over mass extinctions.

The first idea the Geomar team considered was whether impacts could somehow cause 
continental flood basalts. This has been proposed several times, most recently 
in 2002 when Adrian Jones of University College London suggested that a large 
impact could pierce the Earth's crust and initiate a mammoth outpouring of lava 
(New Scientist, 14 December 2002, p 16). But Phipps Morgan's team dismissed this 
idea, concluding that it was physically impossible for a meteorite to cause the 
sustained melting associated with flood basalt. What is more, the geology of the 
K-T boundary does not support the idea that an impact triggered the flood basalts.

The crater at Chicxulub is on the opposite side of the world to its contemporaneous 
flood basalt, the Deccan Traps in India, and geochemical dating suggests the 
volcanism began long before the meteorite hit. 

So the Geomar scientists decided to turn the argument on its head. Perhaps the 
continental flood basalts somehow created the distinctive "signatures" of a meteorite 
impact. If this could happen then the impacts could be dismissed as spurious. This is 
not a new line of thought: geologists have been following it since the early 1960S. 
But until now no one had come up with a convincing mechanism to explain how flood 
basalts could mimic all the geological signs of an impact, the most obvious and 
rarest of which is a crater.

Other important signatures include shocked quartz crystals criss-crossed with tiny 
fractures, high concentrations of the rare element iridium, small blobs of melted 
rock called microspherules, and fullerenes.

Continental flood basalts are widely believed to occur when mantle plumes - streams 
of lava welling up from deep inside the Earth-butt up against continental lithosphere 
(crust plus a thick layer of solid mantle). At around 240 kilometres thick, this 
presents a serious obstacle to the mantle plume's upward progress. But if the 
plume breaks through, it causes prolonged and deadly volcanic eruptions. Violent 
as they are, however, geologists have never been able to show that these eruptions 
could create all the signs of a meteorite impact.

But Phipps Morgan thinks there is a  neglected type of continental flood basalt 
that could create all the signatures of an impact. What if, he says, a mantle plume 
sprang up beneath a craton? These ancient chunks of continent stabilised around 2.5 
billion years ago, in the Archaean, and have not been deformed by plate tectonics 
since then. Consequently, they are extremely tough, stable and deep, sometimes 
extending 300 kilometres below the Earth's surface.

Phipps Morgan believes a mantle plume would not be able to punch through the thick 
lithosphere of a craton but would cause an almighty build-up of explosive gases 
within it. "Carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide tend to outgas from rising magma and 
pool at around 80 kilometres," he says. And the heat from the plume would melt 
carbon-rich rocks, stockpiling even more gas.

Meanwhile, the plume would slink off sideways and pool under the thinnest bit of 
nearby lithosphere. Eventually some of this would spill out onto the surface as a 
continental flood basalt. But down below, the mantle plume would still be incubating 
the craton and stockpiling gases.

The final requirement to make it all blow is for the craton to start pulling apart 
and rifting. This kind of continental splitting occurs roughly every 100 million 
years or so as part of the Wilson cycle that creates and destroys the world's oceans. 
Today it is happening along the rift valley in east Africa; crucially there is 
that rifting was going on during the three most recent mass extinctions.

This rifting would be just enough to release the pressure inside the craton and 
enable a catastrophic gas explosion. Phipps Morgan envisages that the gases would 
whoosh up through a thin fracture in the crust and burst out at the surface, poisoning 
the atmosphere and causing severe environmental stress around the world. The blast 
itself would be devastating. Phipps Morgan has calculated that it would trigger a 
magnitude 11 earthquake, 100 times more powerful than the magnitude 9 quake that 
hit Chile in 1960, the biggest ever recorded.

But there is worse to come. Immediately after the explosion, the pressure would 
plummet in the pipe that carried the gases, causing it to cave in from the bottom 
upwards. "This collapse will travel upwards at hypersonic speeds and could blast 
out rocks from the top of the pipe, throwing them to any other point on the Earth's 
surface," Phipps Morgan says. The energy released would be equivalent to 120 billion 
tonnes of TNT, or 7 million Hiroshimas, the Geomar team estimates. If this release 
was sudden enough, it could eject as much as 20 gigatonnes of rock into a 
"super-stratospheric" trajectory.

Jules Verne's space-gun

This mechanism reminded Phipps Morgan of a book he had read as a child, Jules 
Verne's From the Earth to the Moon which is about a huge gun that shoots objects 
into space. "We decided to name our mechanism after Jules Verne's space-gun," he 
says. Hence the Verneshot.

The beauty of the idea is that it can account for all the impact signatures 
associated with mass extinctions. Deep mantle volcanism would bring iridium to the 
surface, while the explosion and impacts would produce shocked quartz and craters. 
During the collapse of the Verneshot pipe, blobs of melt would be flung out, some 
preserved as microspherules. Meanwhile, the gas decompression and oxygen-gobbling 
explosion would encourage the formation offullerenes. 

The Verneshot mechanism might even explain why the object that crashed into Chicxulub 
left such a lopsided crater. Modellers have concluded that the impactor came in from 
the south-east at an angle of around 20 degrees. This doesn't rule a meteorite out, 
but it also fits with Verneshot debris ejected from the Deccan Traps.

Compelling the idea may be, but is there any proof? "It is a very difficult theory 
to prove because it is hard to differentiate between a meteorite impact and a 
Verneshot," says Phipps Morgan. "We need to find signs of the gas release pipe." He 
believes the remains of any pipe will be buried under many kilometres of rock spewed 
out by the flood basalt, but they should show up on seismic images and gravity 
"Between 80 kilometres and the surface I would expect the seismic survey to reveal a 
disturbed area oflithosphere, filled with basaltic melts. There would also be a 
circular gravity anomaly relating to the basaltic rocks of differing density."

Though no one has yet carried out detailed seismic surveys of the relevant areas of 
flood basalt, gravity survey results are tantalising. Large, near-circular gravity 
anomalies have been recorded under the Deccan Traps and just off the coast of 
Sierra Leone. This is part of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province, a flood 
basalt associated with the mass extinction at the end of the Triassic.

Meanwhile, geologists have found part of a crater known as the Great Tunguska
Depression under the Siberian Traps, the flood basalt associated with the Permian 
mass extinction. This crater has all the hallmarks of an impact, including shocked 
quartz. Could it be the location of a Verneshot launch pipe? 

Intriguingly, this crater was also the site of the 1908 Tunguska event, where about 
2000 square kilometres of forest was flattened by a mysterious explosion. Eyewitnesses 
reported seeing a fireball and this led scientists to classify it as a meteorite 
impact. Now Phipps Morgan has another explanation: a micro-Verneshot. "If the Great 
Tunguska Depression is a relic of a Verneshot launch site, then it is likely that 
the original pipe was not completely erased and that it will be reused by much smaller 
gas release events," he says.

Phipps Morgan is now teaming up with other scientists to test the Verneshot theory. 
Along with geologists at the National Geophysical lnstitute in Hyderabad, India, 
he is investigating the circular anomalies in the Deccan Traps, and is hoping to 
explore the Great Tunguska Depression for evidence of a deep, vertical pipe. He would 
also like to hunt for two other pieces of evidence: shattercones and remnants of 
Verneshot impactors.

Shattercones are pieces of rock with a distinctive pattern of radial fractures created 
when the rock shatters under the force of an impact. They tend to point towards the 
centre of an impact site and Phipps Morgan hopes that more detailed surveys of their 
orientations would reveal which direction the impact came from. "Shattercones might 
be able to show us whether the shock source came from inside the Earth - a Verneshot 
event - or from up above- a meteorite," he says.

The other obvious clue to a Verneshot event would be to find remains of the impactor 
inside a crater. Usually the high-speed approach of a meteorite ensures that it 
vaporises when it hits the Earth. Verneshot debris, on the other hand, would not 
travel quite so fast and should leave some remnants at the crash site. If scientists 
were able to geochemical1y fingerprint fragments of rock at the Chicxulub crater, 
for example, and show that they originated from the Deccan area of India, this 
would be strong evidence for the Verneshot mechanism.

So far the Verneshot theory has received a mixed reception. Supporters include Paul
Hoffman of Harvard University, the expohent of the Snowball Earth theory. "I think 
the hypothesis is a serious proposal!" he says.

"It's a creative approach to a real problem." Meanwhile, Vincent Courtillot from 
the Denis Diderot University in Paris, one of the editors of Earth and Planetary 
Science Letters and a prominent supporter of volcanism as the cause of mass 
extinctions, says the idea is making people reassess the evidence. "I believe it 
is an ingenious idea and I was happy to publish it, but I am not absolutely sure 
that it is physically viable," he says.

Claude Jeaupart from the Denis Diderot University is also sceptical about the 
"It is not established by rigorous physical principles," he says. "But as yet it is
not possible to dismiss the idea outright because the argument is based on hypotheses."

The strongest criticism comes from geologists who favour the idea that a meteorite 
killed the dinosaurs. Jan Smit of the Free University of Amsterdam, 
the Netherlands, argues that the dating of impacts and flood basalts is not precise 
enough to be sure they actually coincided. And anyway "there is not a scrap of 
for Verneshot events", he says. Philippe Claeys from the Free University in Brussels 
(VUB), Belgium, points out that of the four mass extinctions, only the K-T event has 
clear evidence of an impact. He suggests that Phipps Morgan should consider the 
option that the impact signatures at boundaries other than the K-T are spurious. "If 
that is the case, we don't need any mystic and un-testable mega-volcanic hypothesis 
to solve the problem."

Phipps Morgan accepts the logic of Claeys's argument, but points out that there is  
"near consensus" that the impact signals are "genuine indicators of a major shock".

If Claeys is right, it would also mean that impact supporters would have to admit 
that continental flood basalts were the cause of at least three of the four most 
recent mass extinctions.

However, Phipps Morgan is happy to concede that the K- T mass extinction was 
probably caused by an unlucky coincidence. "Chicxulub is so far from the Deccan 
Traps that it is extremely unfavourable for a Verneshot event to eject a piece 
of crust for that distance," he says, "especially without it fragmenting and 
leading to simultaneous smaller impacts around the globe at the same time.."

But if the Verneshot hypothesis is right then we need to keep an eye on where 
the next event may be brewing. "This is complete speculation, but I think that 
the Siberian craton is the most likely place," says Phipps Morgan. "Northern 
Eurasia is just starting to rift and appears to have the right pre-conditions 
for an explosive plume to burst through." Hold on to your hats. We could be 
in for a bumpy ride.

Kate Ravilious is a science writer based in Oxford

Meteorite-list mailing list

Reply via email to