|
Dear
Frederic,
A lot has been written
about this "pseudo-pallasite". The most important reports can be found under the
following links:
Also look into the list
archive. There are a lot of postings on this matter.
I think the situation
is rather clear: this Shirosovky material has never been in space
as:
1. cosmogenic nuclides
are virtually absent (must have been a very-very-very large meteoroid not
fitting through a 42 cm hole in the ice)
2. noble gas isotopic composition is unlike
those of pallasites
3. bulk chemistry is
unlike pallasites
4. trace element ratios are rather
terrestrial
5. contained olivine
crystallized under oxidizing conditions (never heard of asteroid-size parent
bodies)
6. cosmic-ray tracks i olivine not present
(never seen in pallasites)
7. TL data different from pallasitic olivine
(rather terrestrial)
8. oxygen isotopic composition =
terrestrial
Putting it together, the
strongest evidence against a cosmic origin are points 5 and 8 of the
above list.
J�rn
|
______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

