And yes, his piece is MUCH nicer looking than my NWA 1906, and it is different and it deserves to be classified and given a proper number.
We all need to respect each-others work and time and money and not abuse this system.
Michael Farmer
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Fowler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Michael Fowler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 6:17 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Another fake name, serious business
I think Marcin deserves our support for the honorable way he has responded to this problem.
Mike Fowler Chicago
PS The chondrules in the "not-NWA 1906" are georgeous!!
------------------------------ Marcin of Polandmet wrote:
At last:
Comparing now Your photos with all specimens of NWA1906 I saw on fairs or
internet and with all my specimens I must say that THIS IS NOT THE SAME
MATERIAL. I make mistake. But I not do this with Bad intention. I not named
my material as NWA1906 becouse this number was first I saw or becouse I
wanted make anything against You Mike. I can say only "Im sorry Mike".
I will right now stop selling this meteorite as NWA1906, and anyone who buy
this meteorite from me and are unhappy, can return specimens with full
refund.
PS, Material that was sell by me as NWA1906 was also classified as NWA2289 R3-6. For compare NWA2289 R3-6 http://www.meteoriten.com/special.html For me its the same meteorite and now this cant be another mistake, but ofcourse I will not rename my rumuruti to another "good" number.
-----[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-----[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-----
______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
