No, that explanation is for this photo:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap040913.html
Peanut .. wrote:
Sorry, but isn't the explanation of the photo in the link at the end of the description on the POD?
Cj Lebel
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matson, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Meteoryt.net'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 2:36 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Mystery object in photo
Hi Marcin,
This series of photos made the rounds a few weeks ago -- it definitely is not a meteorite fall. Simplest reason: it doesn't fall vertically.
--Rob
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Meteoryt.net Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 2:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Opinions? Ideas?
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap041207.html ______________________________________________
Why "they" think that this can't be a meteorite (bolide) ??????? For me its a foto of new observed fall of a single meteorite. ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
