When you talk about something as large as the K-T event, even defining "crater" gets a bit tough. The primary physical structure was probably around 150km in diameter. Given an impactor that was 10km in diameter, this doesn't fall far outside the 10:1 rule. At the other end of the range, you have Sikhote-Alin, producing marginal craters- certainly as small as craters on the Earth can be, and in many cases the bodies producing them are not identified. In the middle you have something like Barringer crater, where it would seem that the crater may be unusually large because the air blast was so large. It is all very complicated. All the same, given the wide range, if you have to pick a single figure I think the 10:1 rule still gives a good indication of what to expect.

Chris

*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com


----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael L Blood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Meteorite List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Crater maker



Thanks to all who responded.
       Other than the 10 to 1 ratio, I pretty much thought
the same as what most people stated.
       Here is what I did respond with:
--
One "formula" in which I hold very little
belief, is a ratio of 10 times the diameter of the
impactor. This question has far to many variables, such
as speed of meteorite upon contact, type of soil
and composition of meteorite (ie, stone or Iron),
angle of trajectory, etc. In addition, the K-T event
produced a crater (as indicated by hypercompacted
quartz) with a diameter of 500 miles - but the impactor
is estimated at "only" 6 miles in diameter - the ol' 10
to one ratio implies there should have "only" been a crater
60 miles in diameter.
       Best wishes, Michael

______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to