You tell em Dave. Here's the proper way to use bandwidth.

A thesis on meteoritic lurking. I feel a compelling advancement to withhold 
perspective and muse. Judgmentalism seems obtuse, liberalism like a puddle of 
muddy water surrounding the perch-rock, a rare carbonaceous sitting in a puddle 
of siltaceous stew. Moldy cottage cheese-verbalizm, linguistic-spam, over 
cooked spinach days old in the Taku arm; gum disease, consumption befitting a 
lower food chain based reptilian omnivore to whom this is a very satisfying 
diet. Dirt is dirt whether from one source or another. Ashes to ashes. 
Determining why the word analytic starts out with anal; and deeming a smirk; 
very appropriate to a hungry blind pond turtle. I think that I shall put a 
messy purple ink well at my keyboard and dip my delete key finger to the sign 
of denial and withholding. I shall blatantly display it to the screen. The 
court of morality is of dilution and stay-at-home-ism. Let the wolf eat dirt 
when the meat has been consumed by the liberal turtle who stalks from the m
 uddy pond. Old spinach digests well in the slow world of the turtle. Dues: 
dues to the roughshod pony riders who taunt and ride into the darkness. The 
white sheets of light are but paper cloaks for a light wind and rain to expose 
the flatulence of pomp. May the Tagish Lake and the Nantan hold hands and walk 
away in agreement that tin cans tied to a string are but historic rabble and 
the muddy green turtle pond will even silence their ambitions. And one 
day...even the mossy turtle shall abandon his putrid pond, don a sweater, and 
move on.


 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: David Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> How about "meteorbandwithwaste" that fills "meteoremailboxesfull"?
> df
> 
> mark ford wrote:
> 
> >Yep meteormight fits with 'meteorite and meteorwrong' nicely...
> >
> >Good work lads!
> >
> >Any others?
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Chauncey Walden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 4:05 PM
> >To: mark ford
> >Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] metorwrongs...
> >
> >Mark,
> >I like the sound of meteormight; if you say it fast enough it becomes 
> >more definite.
> >Chauncey
> >
> >mark ford wrote:
> >
> >>Light hearted question and a bit of word fun,
> >>
> >>Someone has just asked me an interesting question, what do you call a
> >>'potential meteorite' that is not yet a 'meteoright' or a
> >>
> >'meteorwrong' 
> >
> >>After a couple of minutes with a theasaurus : Some idea's:
> >>
> >>Meteormaybe 
> >>
> >>Meteorcouldbe
> >>
> >>Meteormightbe
> >>
> >>Meteorpossible
> >>
> >>Meteorunsure
> >>
> >>Meteorisky
> >>
> >>Meteorchance
> >>
> >>Meteocandidate
> >>
> >>meteorsuspect
> >>
> >>
> >>I think 'meteormaybe' has the edge, but any other thoughts!?
> >>
> >>
> >>Mark
> >>(who's clearly got nothing better to do :)
> >>
> >>
> >>______________________________________________
> >>Meteorite-list mailing list
> >>Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> >>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >______________________________________________
> >Meteorite-list mailing list
> >Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to