Stan, If it has been officially microprobed, why didn't you get your own number assignment? I do not like your insinuations that NWA 1110 wasn't properly studied. When making a pairing conclusion usually the first number in a series is used. In this case that would be NWA 1068 not NWA 1110.
I feel you are trying to create bad will here. I do not understand why you feel the need to compare your material to ours. Last week it was a Ureilite, before that it was a primitive achondrite, now a Martian piece. Let scientists make pairing conclusions. Submit samples and have the work done. I am not questioning the authenticity of your pieces, just you tactics. Regards, ------------------------------------ Adam Hupe The Hupe Collection Team LunarRock IMCA 2185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "stan ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:46 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] [FS - ebay] picritic shergotite endecut > > here is one of my last small pieces untill I get my next batch of rocks back > from cutting: > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6530722627&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMESE%3AIT&rd=1 > > a 1.4g end cut of picritic shergotite paired to nwa 1068/1110/2373 - and not > just an informally paired stone, this one has been microprobed. > > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
