Hi List, Exactly the same for me. Fred Beroud Meteoriteshow (just back from Ensisheim and Ste Marie; I'll post soon something about these shows... =;o))
----- Original Message ----- From: "MarkF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "JKGwilliam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "meteor list" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 12:39 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] OT: Problems with the Met.Bulls > Hi List > > I was able to open it with IE but not Mozilla, so I suspect it just was > optimized for other browsers. > > Mark Ferguson > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "JKGwilliam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "David Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "batkol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[email protected]>; "Martin Altmann" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 6:36 PM > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] OT: Problems with the Met.Bulls > > > > After reading that some of you were having problems opening #89 as a pdf > > file, I tried it on two of my computers and it opened fine in both. My > > desktop is an older Dell 8100 running Windows ME, IE 6.0.2 and Adobe > > Reader 6.0. My laptop is running on XP Home with Adobe Reader ver. 5.0 > > and IE 6.0.2. > > > > I did, however, get a pop-up message when using the laptop (Adobe Reader > > 5.0) that if I had a problem with some of the file not displaying properly > > that I should download and install the newest version of Adobe Reader. > > > > Several month ago, I was having problems getting the Met. Bul #89 to open > > when using my desktop using an older version of Adobe Reader. The problem > > disappeared when I upgraded the program. > > > > Best, > > JKGwilliam > > > > At 02:50 PM 6/26/2005, David Weir wrote: > >>Hi all, > >> > >>I guess I'm not alone. The new MetBull doesn't open for me either, > >>although it did the first day it was presented and luckily I copied it to > >>my harddrive. All other pdf files work fine so it's not my acrobat reader > >>(I've even reinstalled that to no avail) The older MetBull #85 pdf file > >>opens fine, but not any that are more recent than that. Hopefully they > >>release #89 in original or html format as well, but there doesn't seem to > >>be much consistency to their formats in years past. At least I'll get a > >>hard copy this summer. > >> > >>Let us know if the answer is forthcoming. > >> > >>David > >> > >>______________________________________________ > >>Meteorite-list mailing list > >>[email protected] > >>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > > Meteorite-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
