Jim and Bill, This meteor-wrong has been studied extensively. I believe the consensus of many to date is that it is terrestrial, and possibly man-made. Matt Morgan was involved in one such study and that reference is somewhere in the archives. Here is a statement from the meteorite society.
http://meteoriticalsociety.org/bulletin/shirokovsky.pdf JD -------------- Original message from Bill Southern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -------------- > The photo came from an ebay ad that ended yesterday and I would guess he has > more there for sale. > > Bill > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 11:16 AM > Subject: [meteorite-list] meteor-wrong > > > > > > Bill, I have had the same question. Now to me it looks like the real > > thing. In fact I would like a piece of it! Any addresses to send for > > one? If it is a meteor-wrong it is a good one. Perhaps it is totaly > > different! New things are being found all the time. New fish, new bugs, > > new plants, giant geode caves, etc. why not new meteorites? > > ______________________________________________ > > Meteorite-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
