On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:05:28 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >You bring up a good point! The problem I see is that I do not believe the >term "Main Mass" in the listings has been truly a peer reviewed subject of >scientific interest in most cases, but rather a rubber stamp that has gone >unstudied for the reason of having no true scientific value in the majority >of >cases.
And it seems that the collector interest in being able to call their piece a "main mass" is more of an ego thing than a deep concern for the science. So maybe they should call it the Definite Ultimate Mass, abbreviation pronounced dum-ass. ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
