YIPEES!! 250my is an infinitesmally small geologic frame.
I prefer contemplating the theoritcal lunar origin.
similarly catastrophic but at a much SAFER time lapse.
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sterling K. Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gerald Flaherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Meteorite Mailing List"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 1:47 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Big Bang in Antarctica - Killer
CraterFoundUnderIce
Hi,
Actually, I like it too. Except that I favor
the idea of the shock waves from the impact
focusing on the far side of the planet and causing
mantle plumes to break through and basalt to
flood there. The Moon shows faint evidence of this
happening there, but Mercury has a huge area
of "chaotic terrain" directly opposite the biggest
impact, the Caloris Basin.
These really big impacts are so far out of
our experience that it's really difficult to imagine,
even using mathematical models, what could
result from them.
Sterling K. Webb
---------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerald Flaherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sterling K. Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Meteorite Mailing
List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Big Bang in Antarctica - Killer
CraterFoundUnderIce
by punching through the Earth's crust, thus tying
three opposing theories (impacts, basalt floods, and poisonous
gases) together as one unified theory,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sterling K. Webb"
I've always had this idea tucked in the back of my head. Kinda like a
"perforated" coastline post Pangea. But it's too scarey to dwell on if
there's ANY truth in it!!!
Jerry Flaherty
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
