At 04:54 13.06.2006, you wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:52:07 -0700, you wrote:
>wonder just how he picked the 12 kilo number. It is clear that a meteorite
>fell somewhere in the north of Norway, but that is about the extent of it
I'm not even sure if that much is established. I can't read Norse (or
whatever
language this page is in) and I'm no seismologist, but it looks like this
reading is of two different frequences recorded at one station, not two
stations
(as some have mentioned).
Please wake up:
It's *three* stations:
- Karasjok in Finmark, Norway east of Troms.
- Kiruna in north Sweden, south(west) of Troms
- Luleå in north Sweden, south(east) of Troms
And it looks like the 2-4 hertz event took place over
just a few seconds, but the 6-10 hertz event around 2 1/2 minutes and started
before the shorter frequency event. That wouldn't make much sense for a
meteorite hit, I woud think. Could it be that someone saw a bright fireball,
then coincidentally there was a landslide or small quake or something, and
that
the two events aren't related?
I"m sure that "siesmiske signaler" has to mean the reading from the
seismograph
- means 'seimic signals'
and the "Norsk lokal tid" must mean "Norse local time",
- correct!
but what the heck does
"lavfrekvent lydsignal" mean?
lowfrequence sound signal
http://www.astro.uio.no/ita/nyheter/ildkule06/ildkule06.html
http://www.astro.uio.no/ita/nyheter/ildkule06/ARCES.jpg
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
