On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:28:58 -0700, you wrote: >I recently purchased a small SAU 001 being sold as having a 'crater.' It is >definitely not a crater, as this would not make sense on a stone, right? I >think it may be remnants of an armored chondrule? What do you all think? > >http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-11/877141/sau.jpg >
I'd think that it is probably the remains of an armored chondrule. Take a look at this 869 that I have. It had a very similar-looking feature on the surface of the fusion crust that, after sanding, proved to be an armored chondrule. http://webpages.charter.net/garrison6328/notacrater.jpg ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
