Ok I read what you said BUT what I was asking about is why did you make the comment that this was an interesting hypothesis? I had hoped to hear from McKinney as to why he though so as well.
As to Tagish Lake's terrestrial attributes it is anything but resistant. I wonder where this idea came from that it is resistant to water. What is the basis? Not trying to pick a fight just find the source of this statement so I can read for myself. Elton --- Gerald Flaherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Elton, > I live in Plymouth MA (snip)a significant find. > Jerry Flaherty > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mr EMan" > > > How so? > > Elton > --- Gerald Flaherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Interesting hypothesis. > Jerry Flaherty > ----- Original Message ----- > From: mckinney trammell > > the metal-based ones probably would not be > worth an air fill. but the carbon ones should be water resistant. ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
