Hi Dave, Simply meant to say that if one person received more votes than any other individual, they have more votes than the rest (not combined). Lets say that I give you one vote and nobody else does and Bernd "currently" has, say, 30 votes, he wins by having more votes. I thought it was simple, but too much thought is being inserted into it. I give up, do as you will, say as you must, vote for who you trust...
It is supposed to be fun so lets try and leave it that way. Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Greg Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[email protected]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 2:47 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] 2007 Peoples Choice Harvey Award Nominee > Greg, > > Your math seems a little convoluted to me. You said > >> There can be 600 nominations and if one person has two votes and the rest >> only one, simple math, the majority of the "People" think so-and-so >> should get it. > > I think the majority of the people thought so-and-so should NOT get it. > > Must there always be a People's Choice recipient when there is not an > actual preponderance of opinion? 598 against to 2 for does not merit a > preponderance of opinions in the affirmative. > > David > ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
