Hello Darren, All, By right-clicking the photos, clicking properties, and going directly to the picture URL, I was able to get these:
http://www.njfossils.net/meteorite/DVC01306.JPG http://www.njfossils.net/meteorite/DVC01291.JPG http://www.njfossils.net/meteorite/DVC01288.JPG http://www.njfossils.net/meteorite/DVC01308.JPG http://www.njfossils.net/meteorite/DVC01293.JPG http://www.njfossils.net/meteorite/DVC01307.JPG http://www.njfossils.net/meteorite/DVC01310.JPG http://www.njfossils.net/meteorite/DVC01311.JPG Hope this helps....I'm still of the opinion that it's a wrong in any case. Regards, Jason On 1/31/07, Darren Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:27:34 +0000 (GMT), you wrote: >For anybody intersted in seeing the pictures that I took of the NJO, I created a short webpage of the images. >They are raw from the camera, so they might take a little time to load. Thanks, Derek. > >www.njfossils.net/newjerseyobject.html Thanks for poting them, but unless you only took 269x202 pictures, these are just small thumbnail images. Do you have full sized ones? And do you have an opinion on meteorite or not? ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
